Digital notes – Page 4 – Learning Aloud

Mem Note Taking

I don’t know if the time has come for specialized note-taking tools for students, but some of the emerging capabilities used in these tools (e.g., AI) point to important future opportunities. My comments on these services in other posts have mostly focused on the long-term advantages of developing a large store of information that can be repeatedly examined to address immediate needs. There is no reason that this capability could not be an opportunity for students of any age, but younger students tend to be more focused on the next assessment challenge. So the adoption of the type of capability I describe here will likely move over time from grad students to college students to secondary students.

The impetus for this post came from a post I read on the Mem site. This post explained how Mem could be used as a note-taking tool for college students. I have been a Mem user for some time and thought I would create a post on this same topic. A couple of points first. I use the Mem X version which costs me $8 a month for the annual plan. I made this investment because I was interested in exploring the AI capabilities. There is a free version without this capability and reduced prices for students. It makes sense to start with the free version before going all in.

It occurred to me that students may be hesitant to trust an online service that is unfamiliar for their notes. I think it far more likely students would lose a notebook than lose access to their online notes. Students who take notes using a more familiar application can easily continue to do so and then copy and paste their notes into Mem. Mem does offer input and export capabilities so there is no permanent commitment if having your notes locked into a system outside your own computer is a concern.

I have tried to decide how to explain the note-taking method that makes sense for this service in an efficient manner. I am ignoring a description of downloading Mem and an overview of the service and will begin with what to do with a blank note (the create a note button appears in the upper right-hand corner of the following image).

Mem does not rely on a hierarchical storage approach which most tech users might imagine as a hierarchical system of folders. Because the notes taken for a given course needs some efficient way to differentiate the notes for that course, the mechanism I describe in Mem takes advantage of tags. Mem uses what is called markdown to add capabilities to raw text (like the tags in HTML). For tags, the markdown symbol is #. My example is set up for IDT 540 which is a course I teach, so I am using #IDT 540 – 2022 as my tag for the notes for this course. One nice feature of Mem is that it begins to offer suggestions as soon as it can guess what tag you may be entering (this is what you see below). You can enter tags at any location on a Mem “note”. Mem also treats the first text on a note as a label or title so I don’t want the tag at the very top. At the top I enter a title that is appropriate for the notes from a specific date. There is no reason only one note could be generated for a date. It might be more effective to focus on topics covered and differentiate the notes taken on a given day with some addition to the title text.

Here is the other adaptation it is useful to make to a Mem note. A learner will eventually want to “page” through their notes for study. The easiest way to do this is to link notes from adjacent classes. Notes can be found in other ways using search, but this is a handy technique that does not depend on search. Internal links in Mem use + as the markdown indicator for a link. Enter the + and begin entering the title for the preceding or following day’s note and the dates of notes will appear (again this is the anticipation text entry feature) and select the appropriate target or enter the entire title if none appears.

One more markdown technique that may be useful. For external links, the format is [text](URL). So, to link to the online syllabus for this course, I use the Syllabus for the text and the URL for the Google Site for my syllabus.

These three techniques should take care of the basics of taking notes. The screen view while taking notes is shown below. You should be able to identify the title, the link to the syllabus, and the internal link to the other existing note at the end. Other features on the screen include the button to control the sharing of notes and similar notes Mem has found among those I have stored (the system is using information in the present note to find related information in other notes).

The share feature could be useful if the teacher or student peers wanted to share notes. The previous image identified the share button that brings up the following window. Once you have identified other users or teams of users you share by entering the identity of the user or the team. You can also identify a share target using their email address. There are lots of interesting applications for sharing notes and Mem makes sharing easy among users.

This is the Mem home screen. I include it as a reminder that Mem has been designed as a location for all your notes over an extended period of time (i.e., years). Using Mem or a single course during that course would just scratch the surface of the power of this service. A couple of things to note from this image. The tags are displayed in the left-hand column. Most popular tags are visible and there is a link to all tags. The new note button appears in the upper right-hand corner.

Taking notes in this system is easy and requires only a couple of new techniques. The free version is the way to get started. Copying text from another existing note-taking approach (word processing document) would allow students to easily transition to using Mem “live” in their classes.

The link in the first couple of paragraphs to the Mem blog provides some other suggestions.

One more thing. Taking notes often benefits from including images or sketches. Mem note can include images. If the instructor provides access to her lecture slides, you can screen capture the parts of a slide you think would be helpful and then drag the image file onto a Mem note.

Generative Hierarchy

I happened on this Medium post describing what the author called the Explanation Effect. The article itself was about strategies we can apply to learn and understand and the explanation effect sounded very similar to what I have previously described as Teaching to Learn. Teaching and even preparing to teach are great generative learning activities as most teachers will tell you. You must understand something to teach it well. The explanation effect implies more than the one-way act of teaching others and might be more accurately described as an educated discussion in which the parties involved share and perhaps even argue about something. Hence there is an exchange of information, accurate or not, about something. The Medium post argued this type of experience is one of the best ways to learn.

Generative learning activities have always been a personal fascination and the explanation effect would be an example. It is an example of an activity in which engagement in an external activity provides a likely way to manipulate important cognitive behaviors involved in retention and understanding. Many of the behaviors learners engage in as study activities are intended as generative activities.

To understand why engaging in tutoring (as a learner) or peer teaching (both parties are really learners) is proposed as a superior generative activity, it might be helpful to consider a hierarchical framework of generative activities proposed by Chi (citation included at end of this post). In this hierarchical framework, higher-level activities integrate lower-level activities and as one advances through the hierarchy it is proposed that activities at that level are more productive. In the following image, I have identified the stages of this framework and added an example of each level I assume would be familiar to most educators.

Smart notes require that a learner summarize and extend an input with personal insights or examples. So, a student might highlight a concept in a textbook (active) and then construct a note that summarizes what was highlighted as the learner understands it based on existing knowledge and perhaps include an example. Hence, additional cognitive activities would be included in the construction of a note. It is important to recognize that an activity (e.g., creating a note) may or may not involve productive cognitive behaviors (e.g., copying the text into a notebook) or may involve other cognitive activities leading to even more enhanced understanding and application. As an educational device, external activities are assigned with the expectation that the use of the activity will be productive, but the cognitive connections are always under the control of the learner.

I like to describe interactive activities as involving secondary inputs. If students discuss or argue about concepts from a book, the information in the book is the original input, but the comments from a peer or a tutor are a second input. The second input may add something new for the learner to add to an existing understanding or challenge the understanding the student has originally generated and now force a reconsideration and possible modification.

Chi and others have engaged in research to justify the proposed advantages I have described here. When researchers offer insights that hopefully will influence practice, the impact tends to depend on how practitioners translate general recommendations and how practical it seems it would be to come up with activities matched to these insights. I think educators understand practices such as guided discussion or issue debates and I hope the way in which I have explained the benefits of seeking activities at the constructive and interactive levels of Chi’s framework is persuasive

Chi, M. T. (2009). Active?constructive?interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in cognitive science, 1(1), 73-105.

Chi, M. T., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational psychologist, 49(4), 219-243.

Instructional responsibility and independent learning skills

I started posting about student highlighting, note-taking, and annotation as part of my observation that reading with a digital device offers some lifetime advantages over reading paper resources. The issue of comprehension vs. paper is only the initial stage of reading and the opportunities for layering personal comments on primary sources, the storage and organization of these comments, and the retrieval of these comments offers advantages for studying and written projects based on ideas from multiple sources.

Once you begin exploring digital annotations and note-taking you can move into many different subtopics. For educators, any claims related to digital annotation and related activities (note-taking, highlighting) would typically involve short-term student uses of these skills (e.g., preparing for an exam, generating a multi-source written product).

There are many investigations and analyses related to these ends. If I were to recommend a single source relevant to this topic it would be one that is a couple of decades old. It is also a study conducted with college students. Simpson and Nist made several key points in their introduction that I believe continue to be of great importance. Even though and perhaps because they worked with college learners, I think their most important observation was that treatments that involve a skill such as highlighting or annotation require the assurance that learners applying these study strategies do so effectively. They raise the same argument I have made multiple times. Have learners ever received guidance in how they should go about learning strategies such as highlighting and annotation? If those investigating study techniques in college learners are concerned with what is often called treatment fidelity, a similar concern should be raised when conducting annotation, highlighting and pretty much any study strategy with younger learners.

The Simpson and Nist study developed over a three-week period of time using the type of content college students would encounter in their classes (I.e., extended period of time and authentic content). Students were exposed to sample annotated materials, provided examples of specific types of annotations (e.g., summaries, questions of understanding, potential examples), and offered samples of their attempts at annotation for review by peers and the instructor. The comparison of multiple choice questions responses covering each target source involved the treatment group and a group asked to study and generate possible exam questions. The annotation group demonstrated a significant advantage on the MC exams.

This study made use of paper source material, but offers a realistic example of what it takes to apply the treatment strategies in a way that generates an advantage. It cannot be assumed that common study techniques such as highlighting or annotation are applied in a cognitively generative way even though some within a peer group use such strategies. It is very possible students have never been involved in a conversation focused on the use of such strategies or practiced them under supervision, Students read and write in most classes, but responsibility for developing proficiency in such skills in secondary and lower-level college classes may be one of those things assumed to be someone else’s job.

Simpson, M. L., & Nist, S. L. (1990). Textbook annotation: An effective and efficient study strategy for college students. _Journal of Reading_, _34_(2), 122-129.

Preserving context in digital writing

Some knowledge workers (writers) offer descriptions of their writing process using titles such as “How I work”. The benefit, I assume, is to provide others insights regarding the flow or process used by the author that might result in a beneficial adjustment to the reader’s own activity. I will begin by offering a general overview of the process I use and then will explain how the system works when I write based on a specific type of source material.

At the general level, I imagine what I am trying to do is to create bi-directional linkages between products. Those products include the original source material, stand-alone notes, and my original document that is intended to be shared with others. One additional goal in this process is important. I want to create sources in the process of writing that have value to me over time and not just for one project. By this, I mean I want the notes and original sources to be processed in such a way that I can easily use them to locate relevant information and to be more efficient to use for future projects. I make use of digital tools and digital information sources to achieve these goals.

Context

One concept that has proven useful in how I have come to think about and describe my workflow is that of context. The bi-directional linkages between products I have generated are constructed to maintain context. So, the original sources are highlighted and annotated when they are read. The highlights and notes exist within the context of the original sources. Some of these notes and highlights are extracted from these original sources to generate smart notes using a different digital tool. However, this extraction process includes links back to the original sources to maintain context. So, at a later point in time, the link associated with a smart note can be used to return to the original document and the location within this document associated with a smart note.

By the way, the definition of a smart note is an idea that is understandable on its own. So these notes which were created based on information obtained elsewhere are written so that they do not require the original source for understanding. This stand-alone capability does not mean that reviewing such notes at a later time would not prompt a return to the original source perhaps for additional information or clarification. This review can be useful. Finally, I use the Smart notes typically generated from multiple original sources to write a product (typically a blog post at this stage of my career).

Thinking about the sequence of written sources is kind of interesting. As one moves through the sequence, there is less reliance on the context of the previous source and a greater focus on my own interpretation and speculation.

Example – pdfs as sources

Much of what I write is based on journal articles that I have access to as pdfs downloaded from my library. I work within an Apple environment and I make use of iCloud as online storage I can access from my iPad and desktop computer. Because of the time invested in accumulating many annotated pdfs and other products over time, the use of iCloud provides me some measure of security for the products I generate. I do create backups for added security.

I first read the source pdfs using a digital tool. I have used Zotero, but I prefer a product specific to Apple called Highlights because it is less complicated to use and just seems more consistent. I mostly highlight while I read, but I also annotate when I know I want to create a Smart note from what I am reading.

Highlighting and annotation are processes that involve context as both processes connect a personal addition at a specific location within the source text. Both Zotero and Highlights allow highlights and notes to be exported as a file separate from the original pdf. There are options for the format in which this file is created and one is markdown. A markdown file is a text file that includes a few reserved text symbols that allow the content of the file to appear with headings and subheadings, links, tags, and other such features when opened with a tool that interprets the reserved markdown symbols. Markdown uses such symbols in a way similar to the symbols used in an HTML file. One of the core benefits of a markdown text file is that it will not eventually age out of usefulness. It is a text file and not a proprietary format so there will always be a way to open a markdown file and one does not have to worry about investing years in a tool that creates a file type that may not be useful if the tool is discontinued.

You get an idea of how Highlight works from the following image. The left-hand window shows the original pdf that has been highlighted. The highlights and notes that are added also appear in the right-hand panel and it is the content from this panel that is exported. The drop-down menu shows the various formats that can be used for export and you should find markdown near the top.

I use Obsidian to store the notes I create. Obsidian is a tool intended for organizing, cross-referencing, and tagging a large collection of notes for an extended period of time. It is a versatile tool, but I use it for storing citations and Smart notes. Obsidian works with markdown files and the content exported from Zotero or Highlights can be imported, manipulated, and stored in Obsidian.

Here is the useful capability I take advantage of when using these tools on my desktop computer. Having everything on the same machine is essential. Both Zotero and Highlights embed information about the location of highlights and notes within the original document. So, when a note is stored in Obsidian exported from one of these highlighting and annotation tools, a link will be included that will allow the Obsidian user to Zotero or Highlights and show the original text in which the highlight or note was embedded. Zotero is more specific and takes you to the exact location. Highlights takes you to the page rather than the specific location on the page.

So, this is what a section of markdown might look like for a note (this from Highlights).

#### [Page 248](highlights://chen2021#page=4)

> After class, students should review the notes to clarify any

> unclear ideas. During this stage, the students can compare their

> own notes to the textbooks or the notes of other students,

> retrieve the key ideas, concepts or items from the notes as

> recall clues, as well as summarize the content of the notes.

When displayed in Obsidian, the note looks like this (see following image). If you look closely, you will see the link to the original pdf stored on my computer (and in iCloud). I typically add some additional information to my Obsidian notes (perhaps the full citation associated with a note). The second image below is more what of my Smart Note looks like. In this image, you can see I have added a tag (#contextualization) that serves several functions including allowing me to find other notes tagged in the same way.

As I write something like this blog post, I use mostly the notes I have saved in Obsidian. If I am using a specific source, I will include the citation for this source at the conclusion of a post and this citation would also allow me to work back through the sequence of products I have described to review both notes and locate the original document.

Almost there – comment on the evolution of PKM systems

I have been exploring many digital note-taking and annotation systems for a couple of years now. My involvement might be stretched to a decade plus if you are willing to group tools such as EndNote with this category of tools. My way of thinking about using such tools has been shaped by a career as an educational psychologist with a cognitive perspective on learning applied to topics such as note-taking, highlighting, study behavior, and generative learning activities (e.g., writing to learn, summarization, questions). This background offers some insights into what features of technology-supported learning and thinking tools might be helpful. I have gleaned a few core ideas from more recent reading – progressive summarization, smart notes that I see relevant in combination with both my newer hands-on experiences and my more general cognitive background.

What follows is a personal evaluation of the capabilities of PKM tools based on what I have just described as my personal background and experiences. I have tried to identify a title for this post. “Close, but no cigar” came to mind, but seemed too negative. I decided to go with “almost there”. What I mean by this is that I can patch together a workflow that I think works pretty well, but the system is a bit cumbersome and inefficient. I hope to offer a perspective on what an ideal tool might look like. I have based this ideal tool based on how I think Glasp should work, but so far does not.

My reading activity involves web content, Kindle books, and pdfs of scientific journal articles. Ideally, all of these sources could be stored in an accessible place (I would be willing to live with a location I control – my computer or ideally personal storage online such as iCloud or DropBox). Online storage is important for both security and access from multiple devices. As I will demonstrate in my ideal approach, a common location seems to be important for the connections I see important in the system I imagine. For example, some systems do not store the pdf from which notes are taken. With the service I have in mind (Memex), I can reexamine links between the pdf and notes I have taken if I am on my own computer, but I can only see my notes if I am working on a different computer that only provides me online access. The pdf and the notes are stored in different places with the pdf on my computer and the notes in the cloud.

What follows is my fabricated visual description of a workflow using images from Grasp that I have merged to represent a superior fictitious system. I will be clear on what is not actually there as I proceed. The image (below) shows three panels – the leftmost panel shows original content that has been highlighted and annotated. The second panel shows isolated highlighted and notes. The third panel shows what I now label as a smart note (after Ahrens). The arrows indicate connections across panels that are bidirectional. In other words, you can get from an isolated note or highlight in the middle panel back to where in the original document this highlight exists or where the annotation/note was connected. You can get from my personally generated, standalone, summary note back to the immediate notes or highlights. These bidirectional connections are important for maintaining what might be described as context and attribution. Attribution is important in my writing to link what I write to what others have written. Context is important in establishing the broader set of information within which something I felt was important emerged. Maybe I want to seek other ideas from this same information. Maybe I just want to check on what I concluded because later my summary seems incomplete or maybe erroneous.

The system I describe allows for the generation of Smart Notes or Summary notes (I use such terms interchangeably) which capture an idea in a form that should make sense to me and someone else at a later point in time. The system allows progressive summarization in the sequence of forms getting to a smart note. Highlighting was not part of the progressive summarization process described by Forte, but I think it is fair to use it as a component in the physical transformation from the source to the personal summary I describe here.

What about these descriptions is not available? Glasp cannot be used to read pdfs. This is a serious limitation for an academic who must rely of pdfs of articles from research journals. The processing of Kindle books within Glasp allows the download of highlights and notes, but you cannot link back to the location of the selected content within the context of the original ebook. The personal summary notes (called atomic notes in Glasp) are not associated with a specific original source and you cannot get to that source through links to highlights and notes added to that source. These personal notes just accumulate as one reads different sources in this independent pane. At present, I copy and paste these notes into Obsidian and Mem X to take advantage of the organizational features of these other tools. I suppose it would be ideal if such summary notes could exist in Glasp in a way that would allow the long-term storage and manipulation of these ideas independent of source material.

To be fair to Grasp, it is still a beta service and free at this point. It is useful as is and I have found ways to integrate it with other tools to generate a reasonable workflow. Partly I wrote this post because I was contacted after writing an earlier post about Glasp and was contacted by a developer from the company. I thought I would share what I think a more complete system might look like. I hope my summary of a personal knowledge management workflow offers some insight for those unfamiliar with this expanding collection of digital tools offered to support the personal processing of source documents.

Is the highlighter ever your friend?

I have highlighted much of what I read for probably 50 years. I started in college and I tried different approaches sometimes highlighting with different colors. My preference was the slim highlighter in yellow. When I began reading using my phone, iPad, and Kindle I learned how to highlight using these devices. My interest in educational technology led me to look more deeply into the opportunities to highlight and annotate on these devices and you may have read what I have had to say about these tools in previous posts.

Here is the thing about highlighting. If you follow the research on the efficacy of different learning/study strategies, you soon understand that highlighting is not particularly useful. I knew this too and I was interested in study techniques long before personal computers were a thing. I taught educational psychology to college students and study behavior was a topic I hoped the students would find relevant. In explaining highlighting’s poor record, I claimed students highlighted too much and may sometimes use highlighting as an excuse for not thinking. I called this the “I’ll get that later” strategy. Too often later never comes. Still, I continued to highlight and I assumed many of these students did too.

There are good reviews of the research on highlighting (Dunlosky, et al, 2013) that reach the conclusion that highlighting has low utility. I think it is important to carefully understand the methodology used in the studies that investigate highlighting. What is the breadth of the perspective? In research that examines the application of note-taking, a distinction is drawn between the generative and external functions of notes. I think a similar issue applies here. The research indicates highlighting is not cognitively active and has limited generative value, but what about external storage. If it was an hour before a major test and I was trying to review the 120 pages that were assigned in my textbook, I would rather I had highlighted that book than not.

Ahrens (citations appear at the end of this post) proposes that underlining (I would assume a practice similar to highlighting) is similar to what Ahrens classifies as fleeting notes. Fleeting notes are taken to quickly capture information and the idea of smart notes that Ahrens emphasizes focuses on the translation of fleeting notes into smart notes. A smart note can stand alone to convey meaning to the note taker and others and requires the note taker to use personal knowledge to generate a note that is meaningful.

A recent Edutopia article on highlighting reached a negative conclusion about the value of highlighting (it may even hinder learning) and suggested solutions educators should propose that could be explained in a way very similar to what I have just proposed; i.e., fleeting vs permanent. They suggest that students a) annotate their highlights with short summaries and personal reflections or b) generate questions related to the content they have highlighted.

The Edutopia suggestions bring me to the topic I want to emphasize.

Technology-based reading offers advantages over paper-based reading that are seldom emphasized. I rely heavily on highlighting when I write on my Kindle or using a browser extension that allows me to highlight web content. I don’t read from paper much anymore, but when I do I also highlight a lot. When I use my iPad or computer to read and highlight, I tend to be using tools that allow me to add annotations (actually extended additions I would prefer to describe as notes) as part of the same integrated approach. I suppose I could read from a paper source and have a notebook on my desk at the same time, but I have never actually worked in this way.

If I take notes from a highlighted book or journal article, it is usually later in some process of a task such as reviewing material in preparation to write something myself. In thinking about how I work now, I propose that reading using a technology-supported environment encourages the process of creating meaningful notes earlier in this process. There is an efficiency when meaningful notes are made during the initial process of reading new content in comparison to trying to create the same context when trying to make sense of highlights or notes that simply move unprocessed words from one paper source to another after a delay.

Given the opportunities of reading on a digital device, I think we are at a point where highlighting may have value. Under these conditions, highlighting services as a placeholder for what should be a fairly immediate generation of meaningful notes. The placeholder has two benefits – it marks and saves a location in content that offers the benefit of context should a reader need to make use of the source material later. The marked material is also isolated through highlighting and this would seem to benefit the note-making process.

I suggest it is time to prepare secondary students for these opportunities. I also argue that educators abandon the paper is best assumption. If learning is understood as a process with initial exposure not isolated from studying and review, I cannot see how paper sources have an advantage. Learn to use a digital highlighting and annotation tool and work this tool into your knowledge generation and storage work flow.

If my position makes sense to you, you may find the series of posts I have generated on note taking to be of value.

Ahrens, S. (2017). How to Take Smart Notes: One Simple Technique to Boost Writing, Learning and Thinking–for Students, Academics and Nonfiction Book Writers.

Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the public interest, 14(1), 4-58.

Sharing Notes

Personal Knowledge Management (PKM) and the focus on note-taking have generated many new applications. At this point, I think that significant advances in leveraging notes for personal productivity will come from AI, sharing, and a combination (AI identifying connections between personal notes and shared notes). I have written about AI applications in a previous post.

My emphasis here is on some note-sharing services I have explored. I will first identify some of the issues I think are important in committing to a service and then will present several sharing services. It is not feasible to cover the many options for sharing, but the services I describe should serve as a starting point for others and should offer some issues to consider.

Issues

1. What content are you interested in using as sources for your notes? My personal situation involves web content, pdfs, Kindle books, and ideas that pop into my head. Services may not cover all of these sources. For example, I am a retired academic and as a consequence continue to read and use journal articles (research studies) in guiding my thinking and writing. At this point, I read journal articles by downloading pdfs from my University library. I want to highlight and annotate these pdf and then connect the ideas I discover. A similar source for me is digital books (Kindle). The point – the services I list differ in which of these sources they easily integrate. Some services, surprisingly, don’t allow you to just generate a note from scratch but are focused on saving content for existing sources.

One side note – I have had interactions with developers related to sharing content from Kindle books (highlights). I wondered why you could view your own highlights within a service and yet not share these highlights. I thought it was about copyright concerns and they suggested this was true,. I suggested that if this was the case, they should at least allow notes taken to be shared.

2. Social sharing requires social connections. How do you get from your personal involvement with a service to finding others with relevant information? Are you expected to find people outside of the service and talk them into joining and then connecting with you? This is kind of a “bring your own group” approach. This may be what you want. It is not what I need. I retired from my university job five years or so ago. My interests have changed since that time and I no longer have colleagues interested in these new topics I can encourage to interact with me through a social service. Does a service have a way to identify others with interests I can describe who might be willing to share with me? This is presently a big issue for me.

3. Cost – what are you willing to pay for a sharing service? Are you willing to pay anything? Would you be willing to pay after an opportunity to try a service and perhaps develop the connections necessary to make a service effective for you?

Examples (organized by the length of time I have used)

Diigo

I have used Diigo for a long time and pay $40 a year for the premium service. Most of my Diigo content is public so you can take a look. Diigo can be used as a browser extension to save highlights and notes from web pages. It can work with pdfs. Probably the most unique function allows the transfer of highlights and notes directly for the online storage of Kindle notes and highlights. A newer function allows the population of an outline by dragging content from annotations and notes.

With the educational option of Diigo, I can create a group and share annotated bookmarks to that group. Google offers ways to find others with interests you may find relevant. I admit I have found these methods difficult to apply (try “search by sites”).

MEMEX Go

Memex is under development and yes it is still a service I have used for the second most time. Memex uses a browser extension to allow highlighting and annotation of web content. It allows annotation of pdfs that are stored locally so what is available for social sharing are the highlights and notes only. Kindle annotations cannot be moved directly to Memex, but an intermediary such as Readwise can fill in this gap if important. This would require an additional paid subscription.

You can share individual notes or thematic collections (Spaces). The following image should the icon used to display a single note and the link that is then generated to share.

The notes from individual sources can be aggregated into Spaces. Think of a Space as a collection and this service’s alternative to a tag. A Space (collection) can be shared (see people icon in image indicating which Spaces have been declared public for sharing). When designating a Space for sharing the host differentiates whether those receiving the link to the Space can comment on existing resources or can have full access and add new resources.

Mem X

Mem (and Mem X) are really more note storage platforms than bookmarking services. Mem includes a method for cutting and pasting content from other locations that is pretty handy (you don’t have to activate Mem when applying this technique so it transfers the “copied” content to the service automatically from other sources). I include Mem because it promotes the linkage of notes and it makes use of the AI suggestions to do this if you purchase the Mem X option.

The social component allows AI discovery of connections within “teams” or with identified colleagues. Mem makes a good example of the challenge of connecting. You don’t have to make use of the formal “TEAM” tier that Mem sells and which would make sense for organizations with groups working together. You can connect with other individuals, but how do you find them? This is the classic network problem new social platforms face. The platform can offer better opportunities than existing services, but the inferior existing service has existing connections among individuals that are more valuable than the capabilities of the service itself.

Mem X would be a great service if you had a way to bring a group to the service. A class of students or a series of classes taking the same course over a couple of years would be a perfect way to start a group with some common interests.

Mem is presently available at no cost so I still encourage those interested in note storage and the organization of stored notes (say an alternative to Obsidian) to investigate.

Glasp

Glasp is a developing “social web highlighting (their description”) service. The focus on web content highlight and annotation makes the service more limited than some of the services I have included here. You highlight/annotate web content and add tags if you want. The features I like allows search of public content highlighted by others using tags. Tags can be used to find the public content stored by others and finding these resources allows you to find others to follow. There is no need (or requirement if you see this as a problem) in negotiating whether someone will be a collaborator so the issue of creating a personal social network is a lot easier.

My video Glasp tutorial

Conclusion

I don’t see trying to rely on just one of these options. I pay for three and this would be unnecessary except I want to explore a couple of these services as they develop. If all are new to you, you should be able to try the free/trial options to see what you think.