For the next three days, my blog will originate from Philedelphia and NECC 2005. I think of NECC as the best conference for K-12 practitioners – a great mix of vendors, people with ideas, and a few researchers. Cindy and I come here to keep up.
For those who cannot attend, there are several ways to follow what is going on: Web Video Podcasts Blogs
We will offer a few comments and images of our own.
Looks like the techies attending NECC will be using the event to give educators a taste of blogs, podcasting, etc. It is a great way for those offering content and those willing to serve as an audience to experiment a little.
One podcasting venture will come from a small group of ADEs (Apple Distinguished Educators) – try ADE Postcast for a preview.
If you are unfamiliar with the iTunes podcast option, you should take the time to learn how iTunes now makes major podcasts available to any interested listener (Washington Post article).
There is still hope the feds will put some money into K-12 technology (EETT – Enhancing Education Through Technology). The program has been brought back to life in the House by the Appropriations Committee.
I struggle with the concept of “data driven”. Partly, this may be because of my personal interpretation of what data driven means. I was trained as a quantitative researcher and have been committed to quantative research throughout my professional career. So – the idea of conceptualizing questions and collecting data to answer these questions is something I do. With this experience may come certain biases that have to do with issues of research design, theory building, and a very cautious approach. There is a reason researchers continually say “more research is necessary” and it has more to do with skepticism and caution than making sure we have something to do next year.
So – perhaps I am confused by expectation that educators will become “data driven” decision makers based on my own uncertainties. It is difficult to find the answers to tough questions. However, maybe educators are attempting to answer “easy” questions that have important implications. I hope this is the case. When I encounter an explanation of “data driven” within the practitioner’s domain I try to pay attention. Here (from techLearning) is an example.
Time Magazine is famous for its annual “person” of the year. The company has extended this focus on the “best” of the year by offering “10 Web Sites of Year.
An experimental site (credited to christian langreiter, synerge digitality oeg) generates a comparison between search results located by Google and Yahoo.
The comparison appears as a series of circles associated with the first 50 (I think) results generated by each search engine. Common hits are linked by a line. You can move the cursor over a circle to identify the site.
This is cool and it must generate some useful information or promote some insight. Like what? Search engines return unique results. Try several search engines. etc.
Google has recently filed for a patent and the associated disclosure provides more detail into the ranking techniques than had previously been revealed. (Buzzle.com Summary)
I find the logic of the variables included to be very interesting. I suppose some will attempt to use what is known about the variables to engineer their site in ways that would generate a higher ranking.
20 total views
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.