Tag: book

First it was copied music and now copied textbooks. The NY Times describes how students are now sharing pdfs of textbooks. The article describes a student who scans and distributes an organic chemistry book. 

As a prof. and also an author, this disturbs me. Textbook companies have resisted moving their content to a digital format because they are convinced it will be ripped off. News like this will certainly not encourage a shift to a more cost-effective and flexible format. 

On a similar theme, it appears a site is trying to generate traffic by offering to serve as a repository for magazines scanned and submitted by “readers”. 

A recent NY Times editorial examined the cost of college textbooks. The piece outlined factors the writer contends are responsible for rising prices. The editorial also points to the efforts of Congress to require companies to sell resources as individual products rather than as bundles and proposes that online resources could be made available to students at 1/5 of the cost of conventional books.

The argument is traditional. Textbook companies are greedy and bring out frequent editions with unnecessary bundled add-ons to increase profit margins.

The article turns to an ex-company executive Erik Frank to explain why companies might engage in such practices.

Frank has started his own company, Flatworld Knowledge (Created By Experts. Enhanced by Users. Free to All). with a new funding model. Frank proposes giving away college texts online, but making profits from the sale of related resources such as study guides. When I read the Times editorial explaining Franks concept I wondered how the Times writers could present their analysis with a straight face. The writers argue that costs are inflated partly because of unnecessary add-ons. They use an executive from the industry to explain the problem and present this expert as someone who has a new approach and now has his own company. The new approach appears to be to get someone to write books for free and convince them they will make their money by selling add-ons. Let’s hope these writers don’t read the Times article which explains that there is no real market for such add-ons. OR, let’s hope they understand the way things work so they understand this is what those of us in higher ed call “service”.

” … will give away college texts online for free. He hopes profits will come from the study aids sold on the side.”

Public radio also offers a perspective on this same issue.

My reaction, admittedly reflecting a personal bias, is that the situation is more complex than described here. Sometimes a simple explanation is the way to gain public support (someone is ripping you off usually works well), but does little to move anyone toward a real solution. I do believe online resources are an important part of a solution, but what valuable resources do you typically receive for free?

More in a few days.

Finals are over, grading is done, and now I have some time to generate a few blog posts.

Over the next couple of weeks, I hope to generate a few posts (maybe 3) concerning the cost of instructional materials. I have written about this issue before (If you interested use the search box, I have actually written about this a lot.), but I have a little different purpose in mind this time. I intend to announce a little project I have been working on for about a year and these posts will be my way of leading up to the announcement.

Again, like the folks on television who talk about television or parent communications companies, I will begin with a disclosure. My wife and I write textbooks. This should be taken into account in reviewing the comments that follow. Some may now interpret what follows as biased and self serving. I would like to think what follows is informed.

Here comes the math part. If you must, you are allowed to use a calculator. Absolutely no computers.

Some basic math. Our book sells for approximately $85-90. Actually, this is what I call the adult price. The adult price is what college students tell their parents they paid for the book. The statement is kind of true. What they forget and hope dad does not realize is that they resold the book for half value and spent the difference on whatever. Books are expensive. Okay, so $90/2=$45.

The authors of a book make 14% (at least the authors of our book make 14%). This is 14% of the wholesale price under ideal conditions. If the book is sold in Canada or as part of some special promotion the % can be much lower. Of course the authors and the publisher only make this on the first sale. Books tend to be bought and resold several times (contrary to what one might assume from those using the adult price). Here is another number you might want to consider. When the bookstore gives a student $45 in beer money in return for our book (BTW – don’t get me started on the price of beer – you can’t buy a round for the cost of a used book these days), the Barnes and Noble clerk takes the used book to the back of the store where the textbooks are sold and labels the used book as worth $68. Net profit for moving book from front of store to rear of store and then accepting payment for said book – $68-45=$23. Payment to author for original sale of book 65 (I am guessing here – optimistically) x .14= $9.10. Payment to to author on $23 to Barnes and Noble restock and buyback effort – $0. Please keep some of these numbers in mind when I generate the next post and summarize the analysis provided by the NY Times reporter.

The Business Part

Again, a disclosure. I have never taken a business course, not even economics. Note – I am also not charging you for this information.

There is the perception that publishing companies and the talent they hire (me) are making large profits. I write for Houghton-Mifflin. Houghton-Mifflin was one of the last independents in the publishing industry (not sure what this means but that is what they told me). The company has been struggling for some years. A few years ago HMCO was purchased by Vivendi (kind of like a French Time-Warner). Vivendi began to have financial difficulties and sold off some of the less profitable parts of the business (books) to a holding company. Rumors now indicate that HMCO has finally found a new home. Cengage has purchased HMCO and Thompson and possibly other companies. Passing small businesses around from one large company to another large company is not what happens when the money comes easily. The market for college “education” books is a challenge. One of the problems in writing for education classes is that education courses are small and not taken by droves of students from other disciplines. Companies cannot afford to develop many products for a small market. The money is in large classes and companies are reducing offerings in areas where there is little money.

All this means is that business is business. Barnes and Noble feels it has a right to make a profit. The local representative of Nebraska books, Barnes and Nobe online, Amazon, and even the student groups who feel they should buy and resell books assume they should make a profit. I am guessing the used book store will offer students a better rate than Barnes and Noble to lure students to the other side of campus if they can do this and still make a profit. Barnes and Noble likely would prefer this not happen and will do what it can to keep students purchasing books at the same place they buy their lattes (again why is no one concerned about the cost of coffee). I am guessing Allyn and Bacon will sell their Intro Psych book at a lower price than Houghton-Mifflin if it would help sell more books and still make a reasonable profit. This is what those of us who analyze the business world call “competition” and the idea in a flat world or the round one we have lived on for so many years is what keeps prices in check.

Lots of things seem to cost more money these days. I am not certain how much the cost of our book has increased in the past 12 years, but there are certainly folks alarmed by whatever this increase has been. It is hard to know when you are being ripped off and when things just cost more. I wonder what the proportional increase in gas or bread has been in the last 9 months.

I made the mistake of reading some of the customer reviews of our book when I researched the book’s price on Amazon. There were only a few reviews – I don’t think students write reviews and most instructors don’t buy their copies from Amazon. The gist of the reviews was that ours is a pretty solid book. One critical comment stated that while a good book the content was dated. This person needs to read the recent article from the NY Times on book prices. The Times writer claimed textbook companies put out frequent editions in order to battle the used book sellers and unnecessarily inflate prices. The Times writer also claimed that book companies and authors create worthless adjunct resources to inflate the cost of the book. Now if the person writing the review would have bothered to evaluate the HMCO site (and our own book related web site) the reviewer might have found much more current information. It seems very difficult to please everyone.

Blogged with the Flock Browser

I took a little walk to the University of North Dakota Barnes and Noble bookstore this afternoon. I started class today and there seemed a mix up with the book I use in Educational Psychology. I wanted to see what was on the shelf.

When at the bookstore I also take a walk down the aisle where our book is displayed. It is fun to see it there. The book has been out for a year so nearly all of the books in the stack now have a used sticker. That is the way the course book market goes.

There were a couple of books in the stack that looked like the covers had been reattached with duct tape and that seemed kind of odd. When I pulled one to take a look, I found most of the entire cover had been covered with this kind of plastic mask. I recognized that the image showing through the mask was different than the cover of the other books and it then dawned on me why the plastic had been attached to the cover. I took a picture with my cell phone and headed home.

The bookstore was selling books intended as examination copies for instructors. The printing on the cover clearly states that the book is an instructor’s copy, is provided free of charge for the purpose of examination, and sale or resale is prohibited. Pretty hard to miss the assumptions made by the publishing company in providing a copy to the instructor.

If you look closely at the repurposed copy, you will see a comment “support recycling” and an assurance that all of the pages in the book are still there. The publishing companies have a recycling plan too. Most examination copies now come with a return label so that the instructor can ship the book back to the publisher at no expense if there is no reason to keep the book on his/her shelf. No one says the rejects must accumulate in local land fills.

I wonder about the reason for the mask. Is the book store embarrassed to admit they sell books clearly not intended for sale? Would such a message be contrary to the values supposedly promoted by educational institutions?

I wonder if institutions such as mine condone this practice. A recent edict made it clear that faculty members cannot accept gifts/payments associated with the adoption of a textbook. Ironic isn’t it – it is unacceptable to accept a couple hundreds bucks as payment for serious consideration of an adopted book, but perhaps fine to make far more selling the books you don’t adopt.

P.S. This post prompted considerable discussion among my faculty colleagues. One who obviously is more familiar with the official expectations of our university than I am sent me the following.

11.2 COMPLIMENTARY TEXTBOOKS
The University Senate strongly recommends that complimentary textbooks which are not being retained not be resold. These books should be donated to the appropriate UND library, a colleague, or another nonprofit institution or otherwise appropriately disposed of without infringing on the right of the publisher and/or author. The University Bookstore is requested to refrain from selling complimentary copies of textbooks.
Approved: UND Senate, 02-01-90

(I bolded the last sentence.)