Apple – pay attention

Apple has always done very well in the education market, but I am concerned the company has become complacent. There is a diminishing return on the value of more elegant and powerful hardware and the number of apps in the App Store. Cloud-based approaches treat hardware as an appliance and increase the importance of cost. The number of apps may be less important than the number of app categories. You really only need one good app per category.

Recent announcements by Google and Amazon are attempts to target other weaknesses.

Google

Google Play for Education (see the video) is separate from Google play and offers apps, video and books organized in ways that will be useful to teachers (e.g., subject, grade level, standard). The store provides an approach consistent with the ways schools invest in content – purchase orders and bulk purchases. Educators can then send specific content to specific students.

Amazon

Whispercast (not to be confused with whispersynch) will work on any device – Kindle or running Kindle software. Push commercial content from Amazon and content created by teachers to specific students. Some unique arrangements were described at FETC – lower prices on books available for a limited period of time. Efficient ways for schools to manage the distribution of this content.

New Amazon approach

My wife proposes that these companies seem to have carefully analyzed the frustrations of educators in implementing learning with apps in a school setting and attempted to design solutions.

What should Apple do?

  1. Offer a less costly tablet.
  2. Improve (drastically) the quality of cloud services.
  3. Offer a platform independent version of iBooks

Loading

Hardware, platforms and corporate strategies

I just purchased a Google Nexus 7. I bought the 8 gig version because my prepurchase investigations had convinced me that it would be all I would require for my personal needs and because I have multiple devices in the same “space”. The following image displays several of my options (iPad, Nexus 7, Galaxy Nexus). I do not really need all of these devices. Perhaps owning all of this stuff is a bad thing, but I write about the applications of technology and I prefer to really use the devices and services I write about rather than parrot what others say. I have been an Apple advocate since the beginning. However I also believe healthy competition is key to innovation and fair treatment of consumers. I wanted to understand for myself if a $200 device can get the job done even if I can afford the iPad. I need to spend more time and I realize it depends on what “the job” is, but so far the Nexus 7 satisfies my needs for browsing, email, reading, etc. Early on the knock on the iPad was that it was a consumption device. This was a short sighted view, but if most of your activity is about consumption or if you have another device for production, my first reaction is that a $200 device works.

One of the activities I tried on the iPad, the Nexus 7 and the Galaxy Nexus was reading a Kindle book. Ironically given the focus of this post, the book was Age of the Platform. It is an interesting read examining company strategies (Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google) to compete for our attention and dollars. My take on the book (after a couple of chapters) is that it explores the distinctions between and interdependencies among hardware, platform, and content. Perhaps it might be claimed that Apple has created a great platform to sell hardware. Google has explored hardware to encourage various companies to develop similar hardware products and encourage access to the Google platform. Amazon offers content, needs a platform to do so, and puts just enough into hardware to keep customer options open. Facebook is pretty much all platform.

More and more as a content creator, I am a fan of companies that prioritize the platform without attempting to control it. I do not want a given company to control hardware, content, and platform. We are finishing a book (actually a book and other stuff) and while creating a content product for the Apple platform (an ibook) would have been a relatively easy translation of our content, such a product would leave out those with other hardware. This is why I am pleased to have had the experience with the Nexus 7 that I have had. I see tablets as a big deal in education, but I hope the Amazon/Google model of flexibility in the hardware that can be used to experience content (Kindle reader) will emerge as the hardware, platform, corporate strategy of choice.

I have nothing to say about Facebook.

Loading