If you have followed my blog, you know that I was a big fan of TechTv. I used to love the show and felt it was a great source for information. I liked Leo (he was the old guy) and Patrick. Then, the channel was bought out, Leo left, Patrick left and the program was mixed with lots of game programs. I find gaming very interesting but felt most of the programs were worthless. I always wondered what happened. I happen to come across this interview of Leo and his comments explain a lot.
An InfoWorld article on spam provides some statistics I found very interesting. The article claims 2/3 of email is spam and 24% of spam involves scams and fraud.
Today Steve Jobs did his usual show and tell at MacWorld.
The news – a Mac for less than $500 (without keyboard or monitor). I am not sure this is a machine for schools (price with add-ons would still be more than eMac). I suppose the stategy of selling stripped down machines works on the Windows side so Apple decided to try the same. See Washington Post description.
Apple explains logic behind Mac mini.
As I think more about this product, it would make a great personal server. You could use the default Apache server, set it up using any old monitor and keyboard, and turn it lose for under $500.
Some of the standard software has received some very interesting features.
1) iChat AV allows four people in a video chat. This should allow some interesting opportunities for educators.
2) iPhoto has some useful extensions including image editing.
3) iWork is a new product that is a follow-up to Appleworks. The “Pages” component is an interesting document creation tool.
I have concluded that I am disappointed with the National Technology Plan. It is not that the plan fails to establish clear goals. The seven action steps that are proposed are concrete enough that decisions concerning how money or time might be spent might be prioritized. What bothers me is that the plan lacks an internal logic that I can follow. Issues are identified and expounded upon that would lead me to very different conclusions and different priorities. I have the personal experience of reading along thinking I understand where the argument is going and finding that the conclusions reached are not just different but sometimes in opposition to what I feel the arguments support.
Here is my simple summary of the document:
1) Education is in trouble because math and science performance will not allow the U.S. to compete in the new world economy. Read the first three paragraphs of the executive summary if you do not believe me. (Note: This argument annoys me on several levels. There are clearly other content areas that lend themselves to adult productivity, testing practices differ and may invalidate country to country comparisons [see Berliner and Biddle], and the notion that these two skill areas need to be prioritized ???for all students??? as a solution to the nation???s inability to compete may not be valid.)
2) If you have not noticed, the document argues that the world has changed. Technology has energized productivity outside of school and has become second nature for new generations of learners. Students have found meaningful ways to use technology outside of school to learn, to communicate, and to answers questions meaningful to their lives. However, the productivity of technology and the expectations of new generations of learners does not carry over to influence what happens in the school setting.
a) Why? More technology is available in the school setting. ???Today???s students, of almost any age, are far ahead of their teachers in computer literacy.??? [this is a quote]
3) Goals of No Child Left Behind. The report summarizes data on inability of students to meet goals of performance as established by ???National Assessment of Educational Progress.??? Reading, math and science scores of minority students show very high proportion fail to meet expectations. In fact, in the 12th grade, nearly all students fail to meet competence expectations for math and science (???By 12th grade, only 3 percent of African Americans, are proficient in mathematics, only 4 percent of Hispanics, 10 percent of Native Americans, 20 percent of Whites, and 34 percent of Asian Americans???).
a) Such problems will be remediated by principles of NCLB ??? 1) hold schools accountable to show students are learning, 2) Increase flexibility for school in reaching goals, 3) Provide options for parents with students attending low performing schools, and 4) Use research on what works best [Note: I found it ironic that there was not a single citation to a research publication in the bibliography for this report.]
4) List of technology related action steps:
a) Strengthen leadership
b) Consider innovative budgeting
c) Improve teacher training
d) Support elearning and virtual schools
e) Encourage broadband access
f) Move toward digital content
g) Integrate data systems
Missing action steps ??? what I wish the report would have said:
a) Need a strong commitment to what type of learning experiences should be increased in frequency.
After spending all of the space in this document outlining what new generations of students can do and value, why avoid the issue of what types of learning experiences fit with these existing skills and values. The section on digital content could have been the place for a commitment to what types of learning experiences fit ???how students learn??? and what kinds of capabilities are important.
b) Align assessment with standards and also with the kinds of learning students say they value and the skills they feel able to apply to learning.
The present reality seems very much like me both recommending to students that they read chapter 7 because the content is valuable and telling students that chapter 7 will not be covered on the examination. When pressure on teachers and schools is increased, they will attend even more closely to how they will be evaluated and will invest time and money in these priority areas. Standards and learning experiences that students find meaningful are not what establish priorities. Scores on standardized tests are what continue to be used to evaluate ???improvement.??? Until either the tests are diversified or more diverse demonstrations of some type are used as markers of progress, No Child Left Behind will continue to narrow rather than expand how and what students learn.
My guess is those who disagree with me would argue that nothing in NCLB or the new technology plan would oppose the types of learning activities or assessment options I support. The problem with such a perspective is that it simply ignores the reality of ???behavioral principles.??? When consequences (reinforcement and punishment) are emphasized, behaviors that appear unrelated to consequences are extinguished. Unless assessment procedures are expanded to cover what standards value, certain standards will be ignored.
I saw a cartoon posted at my workout club yesterday in which a customer announced to the attendant – I am here for my annual workout. Workout clubs are used to the phenomena – the new year brings people with good intentions who soon remember why they did not already work out. It ends up taking time and to be a lot of work.
I was reminded of this when encountering an article about the Blogger Backlash. The year 2004 was the year of the blog (according to some) and the columnist writing this article says that the year 2005 will be the year of the blogger backlash. He argues that some new opportunities – audio and video blogs – will add to the backlash. Activities that sound like great ideas still end up to require work, commitment, and sometimes a little skill. I wonder what the average number of posts per blog per year is. I wonder what the average number of podcasts will be per year.
Why is it that when the Department of Ed makes the evening news, the news tends to be bad. CNN (and most media outlets) today report that a news service has fired conservative commentator Armstrong Williams for accepting 1/4 million to promote No Child Left Behind. Williams claims the money was for advertisements. The National Association of Black Journalists supported the firing. Public relations contractor – this is how the Department of Ed described Williams.
I understand that I would be naive to assume that the Department of Ed was anything but a political body acting to promote the policies of the party and president in power. However, I could respect a campaign promoted by this tax supported office if it could at least use a recognized educator willing to offer arguments based on sound data and logic.
U.S. Secretary of Education Rod Paige will unveil a national vision outlining how effective use of technology can improve student achievement on Friday, Jan. 7 at 3 p.m. in Washington, D.C. The event will be webcast live at www.KidzOnline.org/edtech.