Month: December 2002

Last day of 2002 — time to look to the future. Speculating on the future on a moments notice is not easy. How about this — Will the Internet change the nature of scientific publications? A recent journal article in Brain and Cognition (2002, 50, 335-337) asks this question and comes to the conclusion that the transition to Internet-based scholarly resources is still problematic. The authors examined “top tier” journals in science and medicine (e.g., JAMA, Science, Nature) since 1993 and attempted to access any web resource used as a reference. They concluded that the half-life of online resources was 4.5 years (i.e., less that 50% of the references were still available 4.5 years later). The authors argue that this situation represents a significant barrier to the use of the net for serious scholarship and urges more serious consideration of an archive of some type.

So on that note – Happy New Year.

Today’s New York Times contained an article summarizing a recent research study evaluating the consequences of high stakes testing. A summary of this summary might state that while connecting significant consequences to standards-related examinations may improve performance on the exams, other indicators of academic achievement (ACT or SAT tests, graduation rates) may be unaffected or worse may demonstrate significant declines. While this study will likely be closely scrutinized and the methodology criticized, the implication that high stages testing leads to a narrowing of the curriculum or the squeezing out of marginal students is disturbing.

The most recent volume of Review of Educational Research arrived today. Volume 72 (3) is a special issue devoted to “Standards-Based Reforms and Accountability.” In the editor’s introduction to the special issue, the editor states that it is time to examine “… the extant literature in a time of increasing polarization of views about the desirability and consequences of the accountability movement and of educational reform in general.

Edublogs is a great starting place for anyone interested in the educational potential of blogs. This is a great site and also a way to locate other blogs with a similar focus.

Cross Platform/Application Chats

The most commonly used chat clients cannot communicate. When you make a commitment to a client, you pretty much select one group of “buddies” and ignore others. Newer, but less well known tools allow greater flexibility. If you are a Mac user, the new OS X operating system comes with iChat. Windows users might try Trillian. Jabber is an open source project offering software for Windows, Mac, and Linux users.

Cindy has purchased access to the AtomicLearning.Com site through her history grant. So I now have access to the xBox and AtomicLearning.Com for the break. The XBox is not mine, but a present for a daughter’s significant other. I am fascinated by the quality of interactive adventure games and I predict that this type of activity will eventually be adapted for educational purposes. I suppose the production costs are simply to high.

AtomicLearning.Com offers online video instruction for common computer tools. For $50 a year, this is a good resource for beginners. You can check out the site to see what titles are provided. I do feel the coverage is somewhat inconsistent from product to product. For example, DreamWeaver is covered in greater detail than GoLive.

Use the Internet to look up the quality of your old high schools or schools in your community.

GreatSchools.Net provides a database of schools and offers achievement data (from 2000), information on the student body (ethnicity, basic SES), information on advanced courses, and contact information.

I don’t know what to think of this site. I do want to know things about the schools my kids attended (they are now all out of town), but I don’t think I would have advocated moving one of them based on such information. It turns out their high school is considered a great school (I assume that is the significance of the the little school house icon), but their elementary school had the lowest achievement scores in the city.

The National Science Foundation reports that a new review – Effects of Using Instructional Technology in Elementary and Secondary Schools: What controlled evaluation studies say – is soon to be released. This meta-analysis summarizes “quality” studies from the 1990s. The summary of the summary suggests that ILSs (integrated learning systems) have proven benefits, but science simulations and hands-on activities involving microcomputer-based laboratories (probes) do not. Both simulations and project-based MBL activities are more consistent with student-centered approaches. We will have to wait until the full version of the study is released to offer further comments.

INSEAutoreply to Autoreply to Autoreply to Autoreply to Autoreply to Autoreply to Autoreply to Autoreply to Re: 3.2.3 Update mentioned on VersionTracker?

If you are leaving for the holidays, here is something you should avoid (see above). Do not set your email account to inform others that you will be away from the office. If you happen to subscribe to listservs, an email from the listserv will generate a reply to the listserv saying you are out of the office which will be sent back to you from the listserv which will generate a reply saying you are out of the office, etc.
n
nJust take your trip and forget about your email. It will be there when you get back.

🙂