Integrating Technology: References


	References You probably will not find a long list of references on many web sites. This is present strategy to provide the references we use to support the hybrid approach we are taking. We include here the reference list from the last publication of our traditional book. Some of these references are not appropriate to the present effort. Our present strategy is to add new resources as we add new content and not synchronize the total list when we have finished. References are important in the traditional academic style we use. It is important to give credit to those who have influenced our writing. It is also important to give you the opportunity to read the original sources if you are so inclined. Abdal-Haqq, I. (2001). Locating quality web sites: Rules, criteria, standards. Technology Leadership News, 5 (1), 1–3. Adaptive Computer Technology Centre. (1998). Accessible Web page design [Online]. Available: http://www.utoronto.ca/atrc/tutorials/actable/index.html Albrecht, B., & Firedrake, G. (1998). Grabbing data: What you need to log and use real-world data. Learning and Leading with Technology, 26 (1), 36–40. Albrecht, B., & Firedrake, G. (1999). Blowin’ hot and cold about my data. Learning and Leading with Technology, 26 (5), 32–36. Alessi, S. (1988). Fidelity in the design of instructional simulations. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 15 (2), 40–47. Alessi, S., & Trollip, S. (2001). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1-18. Alexander, B. (2011). The new digital storytelling: Creating narratives with new media. Santa Barbara: Praeger. Alexander, J., & Tate, M. (1999). Web wisdom: How to evaluate and create information quality on the Web. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Allen, I.E. & Seaman, J. (2010). Class difference$: Online education in the United States - 2010. Babson Research Group Available http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/pdf/class_differences.pdf Althaus, S. (1997). Computer-mediated communication in the university classroom: An experiment with on-line discussions. Communication Education, 46 (3), 158–174. American Association of School Librarians and Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (1998). Information power: Building partnerships for learning. Atlanta: American Library Association and Association for Educational Communication and Technology. Available: http://www.ala.org/aasl/index.html American Association of University Women Educational Foundation. (1998). Gender gaps: Where schools still fail our children. Washington, DC: Author. American Library Association. (2002). CIPA web site [Online]. Available: http://www.ala.org/cipa American Psychological Association Board of Educational Affairs (APA/BEA). (1995). Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for school redesign and reform. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Anderson, J. (1976). Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Anderson, J. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Ausubel, D. (1963). The psychology of meaningful learning. New York: Grune & Stratton. Baker, L. (1985). Differences in the standards used by college students to evaluate their comprehension of expository prose. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 297–313. Bangert-Drowns, R. (1993). The word processor as an instructional tool: A meta-analysis of word processing in writing instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63 (1), 69–93. Bangert-Drowns, R.L., Hurley, M.M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74, 29-58. Barab, S.A., Gresalfi, M. & Ingram-Goble, A. (2010). Transformational Play : Using Games to Position Person, Content, and Context. Educational Researcher, 39, 525-537. Barrett, H. (2000). Create your own electronic portfolio: Using off-the-shelf software to showcase your own or student work. Learning and Leading with Technology, 27 (7), 14–21. Barron, B. (2000). Problem solving in video-based microworlds: Collaborative and individual outcomes of high-achieving sixth-grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 391–398. Bartz, W., & Singer, M. (1996). The programmatic implications of foreign language standards. In R. Lafayette (Ed.), National standards: A catalyst for reform (pp. 139–168). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook. Bauerlein, M. (2008). The dumbest generation: How the digital age stupefies young Americans and jeopardizes our future. New York: Penguin. (For a related web site see Dumbest Generation.) Bayraktar, S. (2001–2002). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in science education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34 (2), 173–188. Becker, H. (1999). Internet use by teachers: Conditions of professional use and teacher-directed student use [Online]. Available: http://www.crito.uci.edu/TLC/findings/Internet-Use/startpage.htm Becker, H., & Ravitz, J. (1998). The equity threat of promising innovation: Pioneering Internet-connected schools. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 19 (1), 1–26. Becker, H., & Ravitz, J. (1999). The influence of computer and Internet use on teachers’ pedagogical practices and perceptions. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31 (4), 356–384. Beran, T. & Li, Q. (2007). The relationship between cyberbullying and school bullying. Journal of Student Wellbeing, 1, 15-33. Berge, Z. (1995). Facilitating computer conferencing: Recommendations from the field. Educational Technology, 35 (1), 22–30. Berliner, D. (2007). Time to learn. Research Points, 5(2). Available - http://www.aera.net/uploadedFiles/Journals_and_Publications/Research_Points/RP_Winter07.pdf Beyer, B. (1988). Developing a thinking skills program. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Black, S., Levin, J., Mehan, H., & Quinn, C. (1983). Real and non-real time interaction: Unraveling multiple threads of discourse. Discourse Processes, 6, 59–75. Boscolo, P. & Ascort, K. (2004). Effects of collaborative revision on children’s ability to write understandable narrative texts. In L. Allal, L. Chanquoy, & P. Largy (Eds.), Studies in writing: Vol. 13. Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes (pp. 157-172). Norwell, MA: Kluwar. boyd, d.m. & Ellison, N.B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210-230. Bransford, J., & Stein, B. (1984). The IDEAL problem solver. New York: Freeman. Bransford, J., Sherwood, R., Hasselbring, T., Kinzer, C., & Williams, S. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 115–141). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Brant, G., Hooper, E., & Sugrue, B. (1991). Which comes first—the simulation or the lecture? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7 (4), 469–481. Brooks, J., & Brooks, J. (1999). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Brown, A. (1981). Metacognition: The development of selective attention strategies for learning from texts. In M. Kamil (Ed.), Directions in reading: Research and instruction (pp. 21–43). Washington, DC: National Reading Conference. Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-rejection and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. Weinert & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Brown, A. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2 (2), 141–178. Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42. Bruce, B., & Levin, J. (1997). Educational technology: Media for inquiry, communication, construction and expression. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17 (1), 79–102. Bruning, R., Schraw, G., & Ronning, R. (1999). Cognitive psychology and instruction. Columbus, OH: Merrill. Burke, E. (1993). Copyright catechism. Educom Review, 28 (5), 46–49. Capon, N., & Kuhn, D. (2004). What’s so good about problem-based learning? Cognition and Instruction, 22(1), 61–79. Carver, S., Lehrer, R., Connell, T., & Erickson, J. (1992). Learning by hypermedia design: Issues of assessment and implementation. Educational Psychologist, 27 (3), 385–404. Champagne, A., Gunstone, F., & Klopfer, L. (1985). Instructional consequences of students’ knowledge about physical phenomena. In L. West & A. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 163–188). Orlando, FL: Academic Press. Champagne, A., Klopfer, L., & Anderson, J. (1980). Factors influencing the learning of classical mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 48, 1074–1079. Chaparro, B., Ngugyen, B., Phan, A., Smith, A. & Treves, J. (2010). Keyboard performance: iPad versus netbook. Usability News, 12(2) http://www.surl.org/usabilitynews/122/ Children’s Internet Protection Act. (2001). [Online]. Available: http://www.fcc.gov/guides/childrens-internet-protection-act Chisholm, J.F. (2006). Cyberspace Violence against Girls and Adolescent Females. Annals New York Academy of Science, 1087, 74-89. Chomsky, C. (1990). Books on videodisc: Computers, video, and reading aloud to children. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 31–47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Christmann, E., Badgett, J., & Lucking, R. (1997). Progressive comparison of the effects of computer-assisted instruction on the academic achievement of secondary students. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29, 325–336. Clark, R. (1985). Confounding in educational computing research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1, 137–148. Clement, J. (1983). A conceptual model discussed by Galileo and used intuitively by physics students. In D. Gentner & A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 206–251). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Cochran-Smith, M. (1991). Word processing and writing in elementary classrooms: A critical review of related literature. Review of Educational Research, 61 (1), 107–155. Cochran-Smith, M., Paris, C., & Kahn, J. (1991). Learning to write differently: Beginning writers and word processing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Coehn, P.A., Kulik, J.A. & Kulik, C.C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 237-248. Cognition and Technology Group. (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19 (6), 2–10. Cognition and Technology Group. (1992). The Jasper Series as an example of anchored instruction: Theory, program description and assessment data. Educational Psychologist, 27 (3), 291–315. Cognition and Technology Group. (1996). Multimedia environments for enhanced learning in mathematics. In S. Vosniadou, E. De Corte, & R. Glaser (Eds.), International perspectives on the design of technology supported learning environments (pp. 285–305). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Cohen, M., & Riel, M. (1989). The effect of distant audiences on students’ writing. American Educational Research Journal, 26 (2), 143–150. Collins, A., & Quillian, M. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240–247. Connelly, V., Gee, D. & Walsh, E. (2007). A comparison of keyboarded and handwritten compositions and the relationship with transcription speed. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 479-492. Common Core State Standards Initiative (2010). Common core state standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects (Appendix A) http://www.corestandards.org/assets/Appendix_A/pdf CONFU. (1997a). Educational fair use proposals for distance learning [Online]. Available: http://www.ninch.org/ISSUES/COPYRIGHT/FAIR_USE_EDUCATION/CONFU/DistanceLearning.html. CONFU. (1997b). Fair use guidelines for educational multimedia [Online]. Available: http://www.adec.edu/admin/papers/fair10-17.html Costa, A. (1990). Teacher behaviors that promote discussion. In W. Wilen (Ed.), Teaching and learning through discussion (pp. 45–77). Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas. Covey, P. (1990). A right to die? The case of Dax Cowart. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AERA, Boston, MA. Crooks, T. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58, 438–481. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Cuban, L. (2010). Putting New Technologies into Schools: Explaining Non-Rational Behavior. http://larrycuban.wordpress.com/2010/07/08/putting-new-technologies-into-schools-explaining-non-rational-behavior/ [Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice] Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38 (4), 813–834. Daiute, C. (1983). The computer as stylus and audience. College Composition and Communication, 34, 134–145. Daiute, C., & Taylor, R. (1981). Computers and the improvement of writing. Association for Computing Machinery Proceedings (pp. 83–88). Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). New standards and old inequalities: How testing narrows and expands the opportunity gap. In The Flat World and Education (pp. 66-98). New York: Teachers College Press. Darley, J. M. & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8: 377–383. Davis, S. & Nixon, C. (2012). Empowering bystanders.In J. W. Patchin and S. Hinduja (Eds.), Cyberbullying Prevention and Response: Expert Perspectives (pp. 93-109). New York: Routledge. Day, J. (1986). Teaching summarization skills. Cognition and Instruction, 3, 193–210. Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323 (5910), 66-69. de Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68, 179–201. de Vries, B., et al. (2008). "Supporting reflective web searching in elementary schools." Computers in Human Behavior 24(3): 649-665. Dempsey, A. G., Sulkowski, M. L., Nichols, R., & Storch, E. A. (2009). Differences between peer victimization in cyber and physical settings and associated psychosocial adjustment in early adolescence. Psychology in the Schools, 46(10), 962–972. Devaney, L. (2009). 1-to-1 computing in the spotlight. ESchool News, http://www.eschoolnews.com/2009/09/01/1-to-1-computing-in-the-spotlight/ Devaney, L. (2011). Bring your own device catching on in schools. ESchool News. Available: http://www.eschoolnews.com/2011/04/29/bring-your-own-device-catching-on-in-schools/ Department of Education. (1998). Discounted telecommunication services for schools and libraries [Online]. Available: http://www.ed.gov/Technology/comm-mit.html. Descy, D. (1996). Evaluating Internet resources. TechTrends, 41 (4), 3–5. D’Ignazio, F. (1990). Restructuring knowledge: Opportunities for classroom learning in the 1990s. Computing Teacher, 18 (1), 22–25. D’Ignazio, F. (1996). Minimalist multimedia: Authoring on the World Wide Web. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23 (8), 49–51. Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style. Review of Educational Research, 68 (3), 322–349. Dodge, B. (1995). Some thoughts about WebQuests. Available: http://webquest.sdsu.edu/about_webquests.html. Doherty, K., & Orlofsky, G. (2001). Student survey says. Education Week, 20 (35), 45–48. Doyle, C. (1999). Information literacy in an information society: A concept for the information age (2nd ed.). Collingdale, PA: DIANE. Duffy, T., & Bednar, A. (1991, September). Attempting to come to grips with alternative perspectives. Educational Technology, 32, 12–15. Dunkin, M., & Biddle, B. (1974). The study of teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Edelson, D. (1998). Learning from stories: An architecture for Socratic case-based teaching. In R. Schank (Ed.), Inside multi-media case-based instruction (pp. 103–174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Editorial Projects in Education. (2009). National Technology Report 2009: Supplement to Technology Counts 2009. Education Week, 28(26). Eisenberg, M., & Berkowitz, R. (1990). Information problem-solving: The big six skills approach to library and information skills instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Elton, L., & Laurillard, D. (1979). Trends in research on student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 4, 87–102. Ennis, R. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. Baron & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 9–26). San Francisco: Freeman. Ericsson, K.A. (2001). The path to expert performance through deliberate practice: Insights from the study of expert performance. In M. Ferrar (Ed.), The pursuit of excellence in education (pp. 21-55). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Erikson, J., & Lehrer, R. (1998). The evolution of critical standards as students design hypermedia documents. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 351–386. Erthal, M. (1998). Who should teach keyboarding and when should it be taught? Business Education Forum, 53 (1), 36–37. Evergreen Education Group (2010). Keeping pace with online with K12 online learning: An annual review of policy and practice. Evergreen Education Group. Available: http://www.kpk12.com/wp-content/uploads/KeepingPageK12_2010.pdf. Flavell, J. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. Weinert & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 21–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Fletcher-Flinn, C., & Gravatt, B. (1995). The efficacy of computer-assisted instruction (CAI): A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12 (3), 219–242. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365–387. Fritz, M. (1992). Be juris-prudent. CBT Directions, 5 (2), 6, 8–10. Gagne, E. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning. Boston: Little, Brown. Gagne, E., Yekovich, C., & Yekovich, F. (1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins. Gagne, R., & Glaser, R. (1987). Foundations in learning research. In R. Gagne (Ed.), Instructional technology: Foundations (pp. 49–83). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Gay, G. (1986). Interaction of learner control and prior understanding in computer-assisted video instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78 (3), 225–227. Gee, J.P. (2011). Reflections on empirical evidence of games and learning. In S. Tobias & J.D. Fletcher (Eds.) Computer Games and Instruction (pp. 223-232). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. Gehring, J. (2001). Not enough girls. Education Week, 20 (35), 18–19. George, Y., Malcolm, S., & Jeffers, L. (1993). Computer equity for the future. Communications of the ACM, 36 (5), 78–81. Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers: The story of success. New York: Little, Brown and Company. Goldman, S., Petrosino, A., Sherwood, R., Garrison, S., Hickey, D., Bransford, J., & Pellegrino, J. (1996). Anchored science instruction in multimedia learning. In S. Vosniadou, E. De Corte, & R. Glaser (Eds.), International perspectives on the design of technology supported learning environments (pp. 257–284). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Gordon, J. (1996). Tracks for learning: Metacognition and learning technologies. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 12 (1), 46–55. Grabe, M., & Grabe, C. Integrating the internet for meaningful learning. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2000. Graves, D. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Exeter, NH: Heinemann. Gray, L., Thomas, N., and Lewis, L. (2010). Teachers’ Use of Educational Technology in U.S. Public Schools: 2009 (NCES 2010-040). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC. Greeno, J. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 52 (12), 5–26. Grover, A. & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K-12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42, 38-43. Hall, V.C., Bailey, J. & Tillman, C. (1997). Can student-generated illustrations be worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 677-681. Hannafin, M., Hannafin, K., Hooper, S., Rieber, L., & Kini, A. (1996). Research on and research with emerging technologies. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 378–402). New York: Simon & Schuster. Hannafin, R., & Freeman, D. (1995). An exploratory study of teachers’ view of knowledge acquisition. Educational Technology, 35 (1), 49–56. Harel, I. (1991). Children as designers. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1990). Software design as a learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 1, 1–32. Harley, S. (1996). Situated learning and classroom instruction. In H. McLellan (Ed.), Situated learning perspectives (pp. 113–122). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications. Harper, B., Hedberg, J., Corderoy, B., & Wright, R. (2000). Employing cognitive tools within interactive multimedia environments. In S. Lajoie (Ed.), Computers as cognitive tools: No more walls (pp. 227–245). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Harris, J. (1995). Curricularly infused telecomputing: A structural approach to activity design. Computers in the Schools, 11 (3), 49–59. Hartson, T. (1993). Kid-appeal science projects. Computers in Education, 20 (6), 33–36. Hayes, J., & Flower, L. (1980). Writing as problem solving. Visible Language, 14, 388–399. Hayes, J., & Simon, H. (1974). Understanding written problem instructions. In L. Gregg (Ed.), Knowledge and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Haynes, C., & McMurdo, C. (2001). Structured writing: Using Inspiration software to teach paragraph development. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education. Healy, J. (1998). Failure to connect: Why computers are damaging our children’s minds. New York: Simon & Schuster. Henderson, L., Klemes, J., & Eshet, Y. (2000). Just playing a game? Educational simulation software and cognitive outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22 (1), 105–129. Highfill, L., Hilton, K. and Landis, S. (2016). The hyperdoc handbook: Digital lesson design using Google apps. EdTechTeam Press. Hinduja, S. & Patchin, J.W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14, 206-221. Hirsch, E. (1988). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. New York: Vantage. Holfeld, B. & Grabe, M. (2012). An examination of the history, prevalence, characteristics, and reporting of cyberbullying in the United States. In Q. Li, D. Cross & P.K. Smith (Eds.), Cyberbullying in the Global Playground: Research from International Perspectives (pp. 117-142). Malden,MA: Blackwell Publishing. Howe, M. (1972). Understanding school learning. New York: Harper & Row. Hsu, J., Chapelle, C., & Thompson, A. (1993). Exploratory learning environments: What are they and do students explore? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9 (1), 1–15. Huseth, M. (2001). The school-home connection: Using technology to increase parent-to-teacher communication. Learning and Leading with Technology, 29 (2), 7–9, 16–17. Inan, F., A. & Lowther, D.L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 137-154. International Society for Technology in Education. (1998). National educational technology standards for students [Online]. Available: http://www.iste.org/standards.aspx. Jansen, B., & Culpepper, S. (1996). Using the big six research process. Multimedia Schools, 3 (5), 32–38. Jennings, S. (2001). National keyboarding trends. Business Education Forum, 55 (3), 46–48. Jerald, C., & Orlofsky, G. (1999). Raising the bar on school technology. Education Week, 19 (4), 58–69. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1989). Social skills for successful group work. Educational Leadership, 47 (4), 29–33. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1999). Learning together and alone (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Holubec, E. (1991). Cooperation in the classroom (rev. ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction. Johnson, L. (2001). Media, education, and change. New York: Peter Lang. Jonassen, D. (1986). Hypertext principles for text and courseware design. Educational Psychologist, 21, 269–292. Jonassen, D. (1991, September). Evaluating constructivistic learning. Educational Technology, 32, 28–33. Jonassen, D. (1995). Supporting communities of learners with technology: A vision for integrating technology with learning in schools. Educational Technology, 35 (4), 60–63. Jonassen, D. (1996). Computers in the classroom: Mindtools for critical thinking. Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall. Jonassen, D. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Jonassen, D., & Carr, D. (2000). Mindtools: Affording multiple knowledge representations for learning. In S. Lajoie (Ed.), Computer as cognitive tool (vol. 2, pp. 165–196). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Jonassen, D., & Grabinger, R. (1990). Problems and issues in designing hypertext/hypermedia for learning. In D. Jonassen & H. Mandl (Eds.), Designing hypermedia for learning (pp. 3–25). New York: Springer-Verlag. Jonassen, D., Peck, K., & Wilson, B. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill. Jones, S. & Fox, S. (2009). Generations online in 2009. PEW Internet and American Life Project - http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/Generations-Online-in-2009.aspx. Joyce, J. (1988). Siren shapes: Exploratory and constructive hypertexts. Academic Computing, 3 (4), 10–14, 37–42. Kafai, Y., & Sutton, S. (1999). Elementary school students’ computer and Internet use at home: Current issues and trends. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 21 (3), 345–362. Katz, L., & Chard, S. (1989). Engaging children’s minds: The project approach. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Katzer, C, Fetchenbauer, D. & Belschak, F. (2009). Cyberbullying: Who are the victims? A comparison of victimization in Internet classrooms and victimization in school. Journal of Media Psychology, 21, 25-36 Keen, A. (2007). The cult of the amateur: How today's internet is killing our culture. New York: Doubleday. (For a related web site see The Great Seduction.) Kemery, E. (2000). Developing online collaboration. In A. Aggarwal (Ed.), Web-based learning and teaching technologies: Opportunities and challenges (pp. 227–245). Hershey, PA: Idea Group. Kendall, J., & Marzano, R. (1996). Content knowledge: A compendium of standards and benchmarks for K–12 education. Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Regional Educational Laboratory. Kimball, L. (1995). Ten ways to make online learning groups work. Educational Leadership, 53 (2), 54–56. Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J. & Clark, R.E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychology, 41(2), 75-86. Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P.A. (2009). A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: United brains for complex tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 31-42. Klein, P.D. (1999). Reopening inquiry into cognitive processes in writing-to-learn. Educational Psychology Review, 11, 203-270. Knapp, L., & Glenn, A. (1996). Restructuring schools with technology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Kozma, R. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61 (2), 179–211. Kolodner, J. L., Owensby, J. N., & Guzdial, M. (2004). Case-based learning aids. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 829–861). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates. Kulik, C., & Kulik, J. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 75–94. Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition. (1989). Kids and computers: A positive vision of the future. Harvard Educational Review, 59, 73–86. Lauman, D. (2000). Student home computer use: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33 (2), 196–203. Lazonder, A. W. and R. Harmsen (2016). "Meta-Analysis of Inquiry-Based Learning: Effects of Guidance." Review of Educational Research 86(3): 681-718. Lawless, K., & Brown, S. (1997). Multimedia learning environments: Issues of learner control and navigation. Instructional Science, 25 (2), 117–131. Lawrence, S., & Giles, C. (1998). Searching the World Wide Web. Science, 280 (3), 98–100. Lawrence, S., & Giles, C. (1999). Accessibility of information on the Web. Nature, 400, 107–109. Lehrer, R. (1993). Authors of knowledge: Patterns of hypermedia design. In S. Lajoie & S. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 197–227). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Lehrer, R., Erickson, J., & Connell, T. (1994). Learning by designing hypermedia documents. Computers in the Schools, 10 (1/2), 227–254. Lenhart, A. (2007). Mean Teens Online: Forget Sticks and Stones, They've Got Mail. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Available: http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/216/report_display.asp. Lenhart, A., Ling, R., Campbell, S. & Purcell, K. (2010). Teens and mobile phones. Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Teens-and-Mobile-Phones.aspx Lenhart, A., Purcell, Smith, A. & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social Media and young adults. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Available: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Social-Media-and-Young-Adults.aspxhttp://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Social-Media-and-Young-Adults.aspx Lepper, M., & Gurtner, J. (1989). Children and computers: Approaching the twenty-first century. American Psychologist, 44 (2), 170–178. Lesgold, A. (2001). The nature and methods of learning by doing. American Psychologist, 56 (11), 964–971. Leu, D. J., Zawilinski, L., Castek, J., Banerjee, M., Housand, B., Liu, Y., and O’Neil. M (2007). What is new about the new literacies of online reading comprehension? In L. Rush, J. Eakle, & A. Berger, (Eds.). Secondary school literacy: What research reveals for classroom practices. (37-68). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English. Levin, S. (1991). The effects of interactive video enhanced earthquake lessons on achievement of seventh grade earth science students. Journal of Computer Based Instruction, 18 (4), 125–129. Liao, Y. (1992). Effects of computer-assisted instruction on cognitive outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24 (3), 367–380. Locatis, C., Letourneau, G., & Banvard, R. (1990). Hypermedia and instruction. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 37 (4), 65–77. Long, D., Risher, C., & Shapiro, G. (1997). Questions and answers on copyright for the campus community. Oberlin, OH: National Association of College Stores. Loving, C. (1997). From the summit of truth to its slippery slopes: Science education’s journey through positivist-postmodern territory. American Educational Research Journal, 34 (3), 421–452. MacKinnon, G. (2000). The dilemma of evaluating electronic discussion groups. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 125–131. Major, A. (1998). Copyright law tackles yet another challenge: The electronic frontier of the World Wide Web. Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal, 24 (1), 75–105. Manzo, G. (2001). Academic record. Education Week, 20 (35), 2223. Market Data Retrieval. (2001). Technology in Education 2001. Shelton, CT: Market Data Retrieval. Markman, E., & Gorin, L. (1981). Children’s ability to adjust their standards for evaluating comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 320–325. Martin, J. (1994). Are you breaking the law? MacWorld, 11 (5), 125–129. Martinez, S.L. & Stager, G. (2013) Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. Torrance, CA: Constructing Modern Knowledge Press. Mathews, J. (2009) Word hard, be nice: How two inspired teachers created the most promising schools in America. Algonquin Books. Mayer, R. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59, 14-19. Mayer, R., & Anderson, R. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83 (4), 484–490. Mayer, R., Heiser, J., & Steve, L. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 187–198. Mayer, R.E., Steinhoff, K., Bower, G. & Mars, R. ( 1995) . A generative theory of textbook design: Using annotated illustrations to foster meaningful learning of science text. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(1), 31-41. McCloskey, M. (1983). Naive theories of motion. In D. Gentner & A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 71–94). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. McKenzie, J. (1997). Making the net work for schools: Online research modules. From Now On: The Educational Technology Journal [Online], 7 (1). Available: http://fromnowon.org/sept97/online.html. McLellan, H. (1996). Situated learning: Multiple perspectives. In H. McLellan (Ed.), Situated learning perspectives (pp. 5–17). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications. Means, B., Blando, J., Olson, K., Middleton, T., Morocco, C., Remz, A., & Zorfass, J. (1993). Using technology to support education reform. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research & Improvement. Meyer, L. (2001). New challenges. Education Week, 20 (35), 49–64. Milheim, W., & Martin, B. (1991). Theoretical bases for the use of learner control: Three different perspectives. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18, 99–105. Montague, M. (1990). Computers and writing process instruction. Computers in the Schools, 7 (3), 5–20. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91 (2), 358–368. Mueller, J., Wood, W., Willoughby, T, Ross, C. & Specht, J. (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers and Education, 51, 1523-1537. Naisbitt, J. (1984). Megatrends: Ten new directions transforming our lives. New York: Warner. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Niess, M. (1998). Using computer spreadsheets to solve equations. Learning and Leading with Technology, 26 (3), 22–27. Office of Educational Technology United States Department of Education (2010). National Educational Technology Plan 2010. Available online - http://www.ed.gov/technology/netp-2010 Ohler, J. (2008). Digital storytelling in the classroom: New media pathways to literacy, learning, and creativity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Olaniran, B., Savage, G., & Sorenson, R. (1996). Experimental and experiential approaches to teaching face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion. Communication Education, 45 (3), 244–259. Owston, R., Murphy, S., & Wideman, H. (1992). The effects of word processing on students’ writing quality and revision strategies. Research in the Teaching of English, 26 (3), 249–276. Owston, R., & Wideman, H. (1997). Word processors and children’s writing in a high-computer-access setting. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30 (2), 202–220. Paas, F., Renkl, A. & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 1-8. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press. Palincsar, A., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175. Papert, S. (1993). The children’s machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic. Paris, S., & Lindauer, B. (1982). The development of cognitive skills during childhood. In B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 333–349). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Paris, S., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15–51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. New York: Penguin Press. Patchin, J. W. & Hinduja, S. (2012). Cyberbullying: An Update and Synthesis of the Research. In J. W. Patchin and S. Hinduja (Eds.), Cyberbullying Prevention and Response: Expert Perspectives (pp. 13-35). New York: Routledge. Paulson, F., Paulson, P., & Meyer, C. (1991). What makes a portfolio a portfolio? Educational Leadership, 48 (5), 60–63. Pea, R., & Kurland, D. (1987a). Cognitive technologies in writing. In E. Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of research in education #14 (pp. 277–326). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. Pea, R., & Kurland, D. (1987b). On the cognitive effects of learning computer programming. In R. Pea & K. Sheingold (Eds.), Mirrors of minds: Patterns of experience in educational computing (pp. 147–177). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Pearlman, R. (1991, January). Restructuring with technology: A tour of schools where it’s happening. Technology and Learning, 30–37. Perkins, D. (1985). The fingertip effect: How information-processing technology shapes thinking. Educational Researcher, 14, 11–17. Perkins, D. (1986). Knowledge as design. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Picciano, A.G. & Seaman, J. (2009). K-12 online learning: A 2008 follow up of the survey of U.S. school district administrators. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium. http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/pdf/k-12_online_learning_2008.pdf Picciana, A.G. & Seaman, J. (2010). Class connections: High school reform and the role of online learning. Sloan Consortium - Babson Survey Group. Available: http://www3.babson.edu/ESHIP/research-publications/upload/Class_connections.pdf Pogrow, S. (1996). HOTS: Helping low achievers in grades 4–7. Principal, 76 (2), 34–35. Pogrow, S. (1999). Systematically using powerful learning environments to accelerate the learning of disadvantaged students in grades 4–8. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models, Vol. II: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Porter, C., & Cleland, J. (1995). The portfolio as a learning strategy. Portsmouth, NH. Pritchard, R.J. & Honeycutt, R.L. (2006). The process approach to writing instruction: Examining its effectiveness. In C.A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & j. Fitzgerald (Eds.O) Handbook of Writing Research, (pps. 275-290). New York: Guildord. Pritchard, R. J., & Honeycutt, R. L. (2007). Best practices in implementing a process approach to teaching writing. Best practices in writing instruction, 28-49. Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act, Pub. L. No. 110-385, Title II, 122 Stat. 4096 (2008); 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.520(c)(1)(i), 54.520(c)(2)(i). (2008). Available online: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2010/db1108/FCC-10-175A1.pdf Heinemann. Pressley, M., Snyder, B., Levin, J., Murray, H., & Ghatala, E. (1987). Perceived readiness for examination performance (PREP) produced by initial reading of text and text containing adjunct questions. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 219–236. Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2010). Cyberbullying and self-esteem. Journal of School Health, 80(12), 616–623. Patchin, J.W. & Hinduja, S. (2012). Cyberbullying: An update and synthesis of the research. 13-35. In J.W. Ptachin & S. Hinduja (Eds.) Cyberbullying: Precent and Response (pps. 13-35). New York: Routledge. Pease, M.A., Kuhn, D. (2011) Experimental analysis of the effective components of problem-based learning. Science Education, 95, 57-86. Price, R. (1991). Computer-aided instruction: A guide for authors. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole. Real education in non-real time: The use of electronic message systems for instruction. Instructional Science, 11, 313–327. Priemer, B. & Ploog, M. (2007). The influence of text production on learning with the Internet. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 613-622. Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act, Pub. L. No. 110-385, Title II, 122 Stat. 4096 (2008); 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.520(c)(1)(i), 54.520(c)(2)(i). (2008). Available: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2010/db1108/FCC-10-175A1.pdf Read, J., & Barnsley, R. (1977). Remember Dick and Jane. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 9, 361–370. Resnick, L. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Resnick, L.B. (2010). Nested learning systems for the thinking curriculum. Educational Researcher, 39, 183-187. Resnick, M., Bruckman, A., & Martin, F. (1999). Constructional design. In A. Druin (Ed.), The design of children’s technology (pp. 149–168). San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann. Rhine, R.J. (1967). The 1964 presidential election and curves of information seeking and avoiding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 416-423. Richard W. Riley College of Education and Leadership (2010).Educators, Technology and 21st Century Skills: Dispelling Five Myths. http://www.waldenu.edu/Documents/Degree-Programs/Full_Report_-_Dispelling_Five_Myths.pdf Rideout, V.J., Foehr, U.G., & Roberts, D.F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8-to 18-Year Olds. Kaiser Family Foundation - Available - http://www.kff.org/entmedia/8010.cfm Ring, G. (1993). The effects of instruction in courseware preview methodology on the predictive validity of teacher preview ratings. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9 (2), 197–218. Roberts, D.F. & Foehr, U.G. (2008). Trends in media use. The Future of Children, 18(1), 11-37. Roberts,D.F, Foehr, U.G. & Rideout, V. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8-18 year-olds. Kaiser Family Foundation - Available - http://kff.org/entmedia/7251.cfm Rohrer, D. & Pashler, H. (2010). Recent research on human learning challenges conventional instructional strategies. Educational Researcher, 39(5), 406-412 Roscoe, R.D. & Chai, M.T. (2007). Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors' explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research, 77, 534-574. Rotherham, A. J. & Willingham, D. (2009). 21st Century Skills: The Challenges Ahead. Educational Leadership, 67(1), 16-21. Russell, M., Bebell, I. D., O’Dwyer, L. M., & O’Connor, K. M. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implications for pre-service and in-service teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education 54(4), 297-310. Russell, M., O’Dwyer, L.M., Bebell, D., Tao, W. (2007). How teacher’s uses of technology vary by tenure and longevity. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37, 393-417. Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. (1987). Transfer of cognitive skills from programming? When and how? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3 (2), 149–169. Salpeter, J. (1992). Are you obeying copyright law? Technology and Learning, 12 (8), 14–23. Sanders, J., & McGinnis, M. (1991). Computer equity in math and science: A trainer’s workshop guide. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press. Scardamalia, B., Bereiter, C., McLean, R., Swallow, J., & Woodruff, E. (1989). Computer-supported intentional learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5 (1), 51–68. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In T. Koshmann (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Theory and practice (pp. 249–268). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Segal-Drori, O., Korat, O., Shamir, A. & Klein, P.S. (2010). Reading electronic and printed books with and without adult instruction: Effects on emergent reading. Reading and Writing, 23, 913-930. Schacter, J. (2000). Does individual tutoring produce optimal learning? American Educational Research Journal, 37 (3), 800–829. Schallert, D. (1980). The role of illustrations in reading comprehension. In R. Spiro, B. Bruce, & W. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 503–524). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Schank, R. (1998). Inside multi-media case based instruction. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum. Sharan, Y., & Shachar, H. (1988). Language and learning in the cooperative classroom. New York: Springer-Verlag. Schank, R.C. (1990). Tell me a story: Narrative and intelligence. Evantson, IL: Northwestern University Press. Sharan, Y., & Sharan, S. (1992). Expanding cooperative learning through group investigation. New York: Teachers College Press. Shariff, S (2008). Cyberbullying: Issues and solutions for the school, the classroom and home. New York: Routledge. Simmons, J. (2003). Responders are taught, not born. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 46( 8), 684-693. Schwamborn, A, Mayer, R.E., Thillmann, H., Leopold, C. & Leutner, D. (2010). Drawing as a generative activity and drawing as a prognostic activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 872-879. Shea, V. (1994). Netiquette. San Francisco: Albion Press. Sheingold, K. (1991, September). Restructuring for learning with technology: The potential for synergy. Phi Delta Kappan, 28–36. Shipstone, D. (1988). Pupils’ understanding of simple electrical circuits. Physics Education, 23, 92–96. Slavin, R. (1991). Student team learning: A practical guide to cooperative learning (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Education Association. Slavin, R. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). New York: Merrill. Slavin, R. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21 (1), 43–69. Smagorinsky, P. (1995). Constructing meaning in the disciplines: Reconceptualizing writing across the curriculum as composing across the curriculum. American Journal of Education, 103, 160–184. Smilowitz, M., Compton, D., & Flint, L. (1988). The effects of computer mediated communication on an individual judgment. Computers in Human Behavior, 14, 311–321. Smith, J.D., Schneider, B.H., Smith, P.K. & Ananiadou, K. (2004). Antibullying programs: A synthesis of evaluation research. School Psychology Review, 2004, 33, 547-560. Snyder, B. (1971). The hidden curriculum. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Squires, D. (1999). Educational software for constructivist learning environments: Subversive use and volatile design. Educational Technology, 39 (3), 48–53. Steinberg, S. (1989). Cognition and learner control: A literature review, 1977–1988. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 16, 117–121. Sunstein, C.R. (2006). Infotopia: How many minds produce knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press. Susman, E. (1998). Cooperative learning: A review of factors that increase the effectiveness of cooperative computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 18 (4), 303–322. Sutton, R. (1991). Equity and computers in schools: A decade of research. Review of Educational Research, 61 (4), 475–503. Tamim, R.M., Bernard, R.M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P.C. & Schmid, R.F. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Review of Educational Research, 81, 4-28. Taylor, R. (1980). The computer in the school: Tutor, tool, tutee. New York: Teachers College Press. Tennyson, R. (1980). Instructional control strategies and content structure as design variables in concept acquisition using computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 525–532. Tennyson, R., & Buttrey, T. (1980). Advisement and management strategies as design variables in computer-assisted instruction. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 28, 169–176. Thomas, J., & Rohwer, W. (1986). Academic studying: The role of learning strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21, 19–41. Thomas, L., & Knezek, D. (1991). Facilitating restructured learning experiences with technology. Computing Teacher, 18 (6), 49–53. Thomas, R., & Hooper, E. (1991). Simulation: An opportunity we are missing. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23 (4), 497–513. Tierney, R., Carter, M., & Desai, L. (1991). Portfolio assessment in the reading-writing classroom. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon. Tobias, S. & Fletcher, J.D (2011). Introduction. Review of research on computer games. In S. Tobias & J.D. Fletcher (Eds.) Computer Games and Instruction (pp. 3-15). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. Tobias, S., Fletcher, J.D., Dai, D.Y. & Wind, A.P. (2011). Review of research on computer games. In S. Tobias & J.D. Fletcher (Eds.) Computer Games and Instruction (pp. 127-221). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. Tobin, K. (1986). Effects of wait time on discourse characteristics in mathematics and language arts classes. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 191–200. Tobin, K. (1987). The role of wait time in higher cognitive level learning. Review of Educational Research, 57, 69–95. Tokunaga, R.S. (2010) Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 277-287. Toomey, R., & Ketterer, K. (1995). Using multimedia as a cognitive tool. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 27 (4), 472–482. Trilling, B. & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. Wiley. Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory. New York: Academic Press. U.S. Copyright Office. (1999). Report on copyright and digital distance education [Online]. Available: http://www.copyright.gov/disted/. Varjas, K., Hentich, C.C., & Meyers, J. (2009). Urban middle school students perceptions of bullying, cyberbullying, and school safety. Journal of School Violence 8, 159-176. Volman, M., & van Eck, E. (2001). Gender equity and information technology in education: The second decade. Review of Educational Research, 71 (4), 613–634. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Wakefield, J. (1996). Educational psychology: Learning to be a problem-solver. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Warschauer, M. & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34, 179-225. Weinman, J., & Haag, P. (1999). Gender equity in cyberspace. Educational Leadership, 56 (5), 44–49. Wetzel, K. (1990). Keyboarding. In S. Franklin (Ed.), The best of the writing notebook (2nd ed., pp. 46–48). Eugene, OR: Writing Notebook. Wheatley, G. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning. Science Education, 75, 9–21. Whitehead, A. (1929). The aims of education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Wicks, M. (2010). A national primer on K-12 online learning, Version 2. International Association for K-12 Online Learning. Available - http://www.inacol.org/research/docs/iNCL_NationalPrimerv22010-web.pdf Wiley, J. & Voss, J.F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 301-311. Wiley, J., Goldman, S.R., Graesser, A.C., Sanchez, C.A., Ash, I.K. & Hemmerich, J.A. (2009). Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in Internet science inquiry tasks. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 1060-1106. Willingham, D.T. (2009). Why don't students like school? A cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for the classroom. Jossey-Bass. Wilson, C., Sudol, L.A., Stephenson, C. & Stehlik, M. (2010). Running on empty: The failure to teach K-12 computer science in the digital age. New York: The Association for Computing Machinery and the Computer Science Teachers Association. Available - http://www.acm.org/Runningonempty/ Windschitl, M., & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers’ use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American Educational Research Journal, 39 (1), 165–205. Wing, J. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-36. Wirkala. C. & Kuhn, D. (2011). Problem-Based Learning in K–12 Education: Is it Effective and How Does it Achieve its Effects?, American Educational Research Journal, 48, 1157–1186 Wittrock, M. (1974a). A generative model of mathematics learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 5, 181–197. Wittrock, M. (1974b). Learning as a generative process. Educational Psychologist, 11, 87–95. Wittrock, M. (1989). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24, 345–376. Wittrock, M. (1992). Generative learning processes of the brain. Educational Psychologist, 27, 531–541. Ybarra, M. L. (2004). Linkages between depressive symptomatology and Internet harassment among young regular Internet users. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 7(2), 247–257. Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, J. K. (2004). Online aggressor/targets, aggressors and targets: A comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1308-1316. Ybarra, M.L., Diener-West, M. & Leaf, P.J. (2007). Examining the overlap in Internet harrassment and school bullying: Implications for school intervention. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 542-550. Ybarra, M.L., Mitchell, K.J.,Wolak, J., & Finkelhor, D. (2006). Examining characteristics and asociated distress related to Internet harrassment: Findings from the second youth Internet safety survey. Pediatrics, 118, 1169-1177.
About \| Outline \| Copyright