If this is democracy, we need to move on to democracy 2.0. Maybe we need to move back to democracy .9. I thought last year I was voting for some ideas I valued – for a better method of assuring health care because my wife has a preexisting condition, for a more supportive approach to the less fortunate. This year I have no idea – the rhetoric seemed to about what candidates were against and not what they would accomplish. I voted against the candidate who seemed to be running on the platform that his opponent voted for Nancy Pelosi and against North Dakota. They must mean THEIR north dakota – the place where people take care of themselves and save what is left for a rainy day. Never did figure out what that was supposed to mean and it seemed to lack a plan beyond rolling back what had been accomplished. Glad we can’t roll back preventing a total collapse of the economy.