Momentum

The following images shows my new Chrome start page. The page is generated by an extension called momentum.

I am using the free version at present, but it has most of the features I would use. You can see an interesting background image (the paid version allows you to use your own images. The time and weather (upper right hand corner). A todo list and a list of the links I use most commonly. The paid version is a little over $3 a month and while there are a few features I would probably like, the free start page is nice and I don’t like subscriptions of this type.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on Momentum

The hill we climb

The poem read by Amanda Gorman at today’s inauguration had to make an impression. PBS already has used the poem as the source for classroom projects and reflection. Why do you think Gorman used the dual meanings of morning and mourning?

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The hill we climb

Note-taking and note-making

I happened across this post differentiating the processes of note-taking and note-making. The author suggests that note-taking is most likely the process employed while listening and note-making is more likely possible while reading. I studied note-taking and had not heard of this distinction, but once I understood how the author was using the terms I was able to map the distinction to the older explanations that were familiar to me. The author here describes the difference as something called the generation effect which translates as whether the learner could do more than store information that might improve understanding.

The differentiation between listening and reading as related to note-taking and note-making is mostly a function of the learner being able to control the input to meet working memory requirements for processing. A learner can pause the input of content while reading, but typically not while listening (see my concluding comments for a suggestion). So, if taking notes while reading, the content recorded can include generated additions or modifications such as questions the input causes you to propose, examples the input makes you think of, and even paraphrases of the input that make more sense to you. These additions may result in better understanding.

The research from my past studied note-taking as a potential source of a representation for later study (external storage) and a mathemagenic effect (an activity that generates understanding or retention – mathemagenic implies giving birth to knowledge). The need for external storage may seem obvious, but there are alternatives (e.g., expert notes provided to students) so the question of whether personal notes or expert notes offer an advantage makes some sense. Research did show that a mathemagenic or generative effect was difficult to generate. I am surprised that the author I reference claims that the Cornell system is a note-taking system and creates little benefit. I would classify one approach to the use of the Cornell system as note-making. The Cornell system involves a page divided vertically into two columns. As I understand the intended use, traditional notes are taken in the right-hand column and the left-hand column can be used in various ways. When I describe the possibilities of using this column I would claim it provides opportunities for additional processing – highlighting important ideas, identification of confusing sections that might require asking for help, interesting examples that come to mind. These ideas would seem nearly ideal examples of note-making.

Anyway, I have been promoting technology-enabled note-taking I propose allows learners to overcome the limitations of taking notes on paper. This type of tool allows a learner to overcome the issue of working memory limitations that plague note-taking while listening. There are multiple tools that are examples of what I have in mind, but the one I have used for years is SoundNote. This tool records audio and simultaneously allows note-taking. The notes are automatically linking to the point in the recorded when the keyboard or stylus enters a note. So, when studying, if there is something confusing about the notes, clicking on a note allows a review of the associated audio content. Working memory overload is avoided by separating the taking of notes from the need for external storage. You end up with a complete audio recording and your notes. The notes would be more personal and efficient to review. The audio is always there as a backup. You learn to even enter a placeholder when you miss something you did not understand well enough to summarize in a note – “confusing stuff” or several question marks ???. The digital notes can also be upgraded once class is over. If you review notes immediately, you often think of things you did not record. You can also create a more complete set of notes later by reviewing sections of the audio.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Note-taking and note-making

A group of groups

I have been reading Aral’s The Hype Machine. The author was explaining the network effect and expanded my understanding of what the phrase means. Within the context of explaining how Facebook overtook MySpace, Aral offered the explanation the while Facebook has some technological advantages it was really that users came to the Facebook as groups already consisting of users who knew each other. Hence, Facebook was initially launched as a group of groups (colleges). This provided immediate contacts and interaction allowing the connection with others to emerge from this base.

I have struggled trying to invest my own attention and content in new social media sites (WT:Social, MeWe). I attributed this struggle to my original understanding of the network effect – a site has value that is a function of the number of users. My more nuanced insight has implications for how this might be changed. For example, it might make sense for educators interested in the collaborations possible in a social media site first join with colleagues from the same school. From this base, the biology teachers, the elementary teachers, etc. might branch out to make new connections. I might ask the students in a class to use a given social media site for the duration of my course and then see who would hang on afterward.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on A group of groups

Big Picture People

Big Picture People (BPPers) make great authors. They are able to explain things in a way that make sense often tying together things we know and things we don’t to offer clarity on topics we want to understand. Yuval Harari is a BPPer and responsible for Sapiens, Homo Deus, and 21 Lessons for the 21st Century. These are books I own and that impressed me. Unfortunately, these are books I bought to listen to and not to read. I am able to learn by listening, but it has to be like it was in college when I would sit and take notes and not while I listen and walk or drive or worse yet when I listen for 30 minutes before I fall asleep.

I encourage you to listen to this episode of from the Your undivided attention podcast series. It is one of the better explanations of why people are willing to ignore factual truth and seize on a story that moves them. Why is it things were different in 2016 and how the strange behavior of folks who obviously think differently than I do were collectively activated by social media.

BTW – Harari also has a graphic history of Sapiens if the book or the podcast don’t do it for you.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on Big Picture People

Block cookies and compensate creators

The Brave browser offers a solution to two important interrelated Internet problems – how to block the setting of cookies that collect personal information and how to compensate content creators and online services when the ads they use to generate revue are blocked. The following video explains how Brave addresses these two issues.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Block cookies and compensate creators