Google and Apple are squeezing Brave

I have supported and used the Brave browser and ecosystem since the ecosystem has been available. If applied by a user, the Brave exosystem both blocks the collection of personal information as is common with our browsers and allows a way to display ads without collecting and sharing personal information to compensate content creators and service providers.

I work on multiple devices and lately I have experienced the way both Google and Apple have diminished the full potential of Brave.

So, if you use the Brave browser on an Apple or Windows computer, you can both block the collection of personal information, view Brave supported ads, and compensate content providers. All of these features are available from the two icons located to the right of the text window displaying the URL you have accessed with the Browser. The lion icon will allow you turn on ad blocking (and other blocking capabilities) and the triangle icon opens up a page allowing you to collect BAT (a cryptocurrency from viewing Brave ads) and allocate BAT to the content providers you visit.

Recently, Apple removed certain features Brave offered from iOS devices. You can still block ads and cookies, but you can no longer reward providers based on the extent to which you spend time with their content or services. For example, you cannot tip a provider for content you find particularly useful. Apple explains this as violating a policy concerning the exchange of resources outside of the Apple store (see the linked information for a better description). So the browser looks and acts differently on a phone or tabler.

A Chromebook (Google) will allow a user to download and use the browser (it is built with chromium) and you can block the collection of personal information, but you cannot display ads or compensate creators. I suppose since Google supports itself by selling ads this makes sense.

I am satisfied with using Brave on a computer, but I am concerned with the long term opportunities of the model because the company is being squeezed out of making revenue on so many devices.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on Google and Apple are squeezing Brave

Political agenda likely to impact educators

FETC offered a presentation from Julia Martin attempting to identify how the election of President Biden will impact educators and learners. The presenter made her slide deck available as a pdf. It is available below. The second file is the same pdf with my notes – this is a pdf bundle and I would recommend Skim to read this bundle.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Political agenda likely to impact educators

FETC Online

I have signed up for the FETC conference that runs from today for the next four days. This conference when face to face was always our favorite. ISTE was too large and too expensive. It was large, but there had become practical challenges just getting into the sessions you wanted to attend. We had to kind of skip every other sessions if we were interested in back to back sessions because room attendance limits made it impossible to walk from room to room and get in.

FETC is free and online. This means there are no longer challenges watching the sessions that interest you. The downside is that the money to run the conference comes from corporate sponsors and the great majority of the sessions are essentially corporate run. The cost/usefulness tradeoff will likely be a personal issue. I encourage you to quickly join and make your own decision here. I need to do the same. I would rather pay say $25 a day and allow the conference the resources to offer a greater variety of content. However, for the cost I can watch a session or two even if I don’t find the approach to be what I would prefer.

I think our present online necessity offers the opportunity rethink many things. I believe online will become more popular perhaps as a way for K12 schools to share access to a few classes that are not practical for individual districts. Learning online is different and it is likely an acquired skill everyone should experience.

Do give FETC a try and for those working during the live sessions take a look at the archived content.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on FETC Online

More than blogs

I have come to the conclusion that when it comes to encouraging participation and interaction blogs are not enough. I don’t think this should necessarily be the case because the comment feature would allow give and take. If folks ever used the comment feature much, the rise of social media services seemed to siphon off whatever interest in interaction existed.

Facebook has been the social media go to site for most. I do have a presence on Facebook, but I have not invested in posting the education-oriented content I write there. I have an objection to the business model Facebook used to gain widespread acceptance offering a free service that users pay for with their personal information. This personal information does provide for more useful ads, but it also allowed large scale manipulation that has done a lot of damage.

There are quality alternatives to Facebook and I have explored most of them. The challenge they all face is the network effect. The value of social sites over blogs is the interaction that social sites prioritize and once membership builds up to provide this interaction, it has proven very difficult to get Facebook users to even try other services. A quick experiment exploring other sites is likely to be disappointing as there will likely be few opportunities to find others with similar interests.

I have decided to give a couple of other social sites a year commitment and I invite you to join me. I have created a group on these sites and cross-posted content I first added to my blogs so there would be content available for anyone who took a look at these groups. I can’t say I have had much success. I can generate some views of my content, but I can’t get others to post to the groups. As far as total views go, I would be better off focusing on my blogs. Just because I created a group and posted multiple items to these groups does not mean I want the focus of the group to be on what I write.

So, the intent of this post is to offer an invitation to others. Ignore me as the originator of the group. If you are a blogger, take a look and cross-post your material. React to my posts or to the posts from others if such posts materialize. Give it a month or so and see what you think.

K12 EdTech on Wt:Social

Educational Technology on MeWe

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on More than blogs

FCC nominee offers positive opportunities for edtech

President Biden’s pick for FCC head offers positive opportunities for edtech. Jessica Rosenworcel is pro net neutrality, supports extending high-speed access to underserved homes, and specifically identifies learning opportunities in the home as issues she intends to support.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on FCC nominee offers positive opportunities for edtech

Revisiting what I thought in 2006

I happened across this blog post I wrote in 2006. I was and continue to be a champion of the opportunities for participation the Internet has provided. What I failed to anticipate was the rise of social media services such as Facebook and Twitter which make it easy for individuals to participate on a common, easy to use site. I have mixed feelings about the lack of control this requires.

Read/Write Web Under Threat

Is the read/write web moving toward extinction? Lawrence Lessig argues the negative position from his unique legal perspective. His focus typically involves commercial moves to block creative repurposing of content. The example in this article is kids being asked to desist from creating music videos by adding their own art to commercial music. To tell the truth, I can see the position of the music companies – if I can access a music video and I can strip the music why should I not anticipate that the people who invested to produce the music would not object. I assume this is the concern. Should the companies be concerned? I can’t say – the work to create these products would seem to limit how many are actually available, but perhaps the concern is that such student activities will spawn related ventures and where will the line be drawn?

I think the real threat, if threat can be considered the correct word, is that of commercial resources – e.g., blogs, podcasts from CNN, New York Times, etc. Those individuals hoping to “have a voice” and “participate in the dialog” will likely receive less attention. I am not sure this would bother me. I am still of the opinion that we produce content because we value the experience and, if we feel the need, we find ways to generate our own audience – perhaps by interacting with others who value the social experience as much as accessing the content provided by commercial “experts”.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Revisiting what I thought in 2006