Surveilling learners?

I stumbled into a heated Twitter discussion last night. Thinking back, after some of the political interactions I have had over the past year or so, the interaction was kind of cute. I am trying to reconstruct the interactions this morning, but I am having to guess at some of the details because those participating have removed some of their tweets. I do know that some of the participants are aligned with different online services so this situation was similar to Democrats and Republicans arguing over a given issue.

My guess is that the interaction began with a reference to this article from The Georgetown Voice titled Welcome to Surveillance University. The focus of the article was on technology services allowing the behavior of students to be monitored. Examples included test monitoring services for distance students, questions regarding the use of the camera on a student’s computer to monitor their presence while in a remote learning class, and more to my personal interests software that allows the educator to determine whether or not a student has read the assigned material.

This final topic targeted a service, Perusall, I had reviewed as part of my interest in what I call layering services. Without getting into the details of what I mean by layering, such services allow a teacher or learner to add elements to existing digital content. Elements include questions, notes, highlights, discussion prompts, etc. Some systems include a way to evaluate learner responses to prompts (questions) or the use of some elements (highlighting). Perusall also tracks student reading of the assigned material. Other services I have reviewed may do so as well. This was just not a capability I paid much attention to.

Several of the Twitter participants labeled tracking whether a student had completed a reading assignment as surveillance which appeared to set off someone associated with Perusall. The phrase “surveillance capitalism” was thrown around. This is an inappropriate use of Sashona Zuboff’s concept which is focused on service providers harvesting user data to target ads and profit from the display and the sale of targeted ads to companies willing to pay. It is the reason you get many online services without paying money for them. You pay with your attention and your data. A teacher using the capability of a service to monitor student completion of assignments is not involved in surveillance capitalism.

W

hat about monitoring student completion of assignments? Obviously, educators require students to hand in assignments that have been given without necessarily grading them. Handing in the assignment obviously involves determining if the task had been done. Maybe this is simply what the teacher wants to know. Does this involve surveillance and show a lack of trust? Technology that is used to deliver content can easily enough be adapted to track whether or not someone who must sign in to view that content spends time on the material. My position in the Twitter interaction was that as an educator I might want to know this information. It would have an influence on my understanding of other student behaviors. If a student was struggling to grasp assigned material, knowing whether the student had attempted to study the material and struggled or not read the material would be an important distinction. This just seems obvious to me.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.