Apple/Samsung decision analysis (not mine)

I have been searching for a summary of reaction to the Apple/Samsung patent decision. Here is a summary of comments provided by analysts (from CNN). I am in the camp of those who believes a) there was patent infringement, b) some of the patents address trivial features (I am still trying to understand which patents were the focus), and c) competition is important so we need more than a single innovator in the smartphone and tablet space (you may feel Samsung was not actually innovating).