Who is influential in reducing bullying?

I have had the opportunity to investigate cyberbullying in middle schools through a grad student, Brett Holfeld (now PhD), who had an interest in the topic. Moving past description was an issue for those interested in the problem. Most of the recommendations given for dealing with the issue was speculation without much in the way of documentation. One of the general recommendations I remember was to prevent bullying behavior from being “normalized”. This roughly translated as understanding that such behavior is actually not acceptable (or normal). Schools attempted to make it clear that aggressive online behavior directed at peers was unacceptable. It sounds obvious, but it is more difficult than it might seem to actually convey this message in a way that convinces others “the flaws are in the perpetrators and not the victims” (my way of understanding).

Those of us in educational technology might suggest that educators encourage students to create public service announcements taking a stand against bullying. A recent study now seems to suggest that similar approaches work especially if featuring “social referents”. Messages from some students are more influential than messages from others.

The research (Paluck, Shepard & Aronow) is available online as a “prepublication”.

Loading

Online bystander apathy

All students who have taken a Social Psychology course have been exposed to the work of Darley and Latane on bystander apathy. The study followed the infamous public murder of Kitty Genovese. Research following the event attempted to understand why no one had come to her aid. By staging simulated events under different conditions, the research evaluated various hypotheses.

Obviously, bullying and cyberbullying provide similar circumstances and bystander apathy is often offered as an explanation for lack of intervention. Why are attackers not reprimanded by others? Note that encouraging peers to intervene online is frequently offered  as a possible solution.

A recent study (I believe unpublished at present) has taken a similar experimental approach to studying cyberbullying (Dillon). The results are very similar to the old Darley and Latane research and just as disheartening. However, the manipulative methodology does offer a useful approach for evaluating the impact of whatever techniques are used to encourage peer support.

Loading

MySpace Motivates Teen Beating?

My wife watches the Today show every morning before we head to work. If you happen to do the same, you know that one of the featured stories “today” examined the beating of a girl by 6 acquaintances in Florida. The beating was supposedly in retaliation for comments made by the victim on MySpace. The beating was also taped so the perpetrators could use it later to further humiliate the victim.

This incident will likely generate a great deal of media attention. I am concerned with the “spin” that may be attached.

The Sheriff investigating the case was quoted in the Today show online summary saying:

“Our goal is not only to deal with this issue, but to try to educate parents across the state and across the nation that this is what your children are watching,” he said. “This is what some children are participating in. And we as a society have got to say, ‘This has to stop,’ because if we desensitize our children to this today, then what’s next tomorrow?”

Today does include a segment from the beating for viewing. It is shocking and potentially could  encourage parents, educators, and law enforcement personnel to take bullying more seriously. Actually, I am not certain who must be convinced this is a problem. I am concerned that the video also serves as a positive example for misguided adolescents. Somehow recording the bullying of peers has become cool. How do you change such a perception? Certainly not by filtering and pretending it does not exist.

Loading