Quibbling About Copyright and Fair Use Is Off Target

The recent release of a “best practices” guide to copyright and fair use has generated the typical echo effect among educational bloggers. It is pretty obvious from my previous comments that there is something about more and more liberal interpretation of “fair use” that annoys me. The exact source of this annoyance is difficult to pin down. I think it has something to do with my typical reaction when I interpret behavior as based in assumptions of entitlement.

  • That is good stuff.
  • I deserve that good stuff whether I feel like compensating those responsible or not.

I really think a different approach should be promoted within the educational community. This approach would be based in principles of learning by doing/authoring and sharing. Creative commons, inexpensive online social applications and tools, and wider acceptance of authentic projects encourage the type of personal commitment I would like to support.

Why assume you have a right to the good stuff someone else expects to be compensated for creating? Have you made the effort to search for resources others offer you the rights to use? Have you made the effort to contribute to such a sharing community yourself? When are choices based in convenience and self-indulgence?

Why isn’t the online discussion focusing on questions such as these and promoting the work of those who take the sharing option?

Yes, I know projects like this exist. There are big and small efforts to share lessons and learning objects (e.g., Merlot).

My favorite “test case” for this approach might be the effort of Bernie Dodge to establish a repository and organizational system for web quests (Quest Garden). I wonder how this project is going. The site still exists. I tried “One Trick Pony” , Dr. Dodge’s blog, but he hasn’t posted since July of 2007. One issue is this. The “sharing” site requires a minimal fee to support the cost of server space, maintenance, etc. I wonder if use has grown. I wonder if the fee was too much and folks only respond to free. A second issue is simply the willingness of individuals to contribute webquests they have developed.

BTW – I do think it is important to back up your own position with actions. I do expect people to pay for some resources I create (our books). I also make the effort to share (my free book). I hope you take a look and I also hope you offer resources you create.

Blogged with the Flock Browser

Loading

Paranoid? I am no longer alone

I am no longer one of the few worried about investing too much time in free online services. See Jason Perlow’s post concerning Flickr (my previous example) with the recent resignation of Jerry Yang and the possibility Yahoo! may tank. If you have made heavy use of Flickr and have assumed your image collection is safe, Perlow explains how to backup your images.

My use of Flickr does not really exemplify the situation that concerns Perlow. I use Flickr mostly as a backup for a subset of the larger collection I keep on several of the computers we own. I am still interested in this topic because I would hate to promote a service and then learn that folks who follow my recommendations end up losing their investment of time.

This is one of the dangers of promoting tech applications. For several editions of our textbook, we used HyperStudio as our main example when discussing student multimedia authoring. Soon after the printing of one edition, HyperStudio pretty much dropped off the map. We switched to products from eZedia for our most recent edition. Soon after publication, eZedia was purchased by Safari Video and development seemed to slow with the emphasis on video access more so than student authoring. However, HyperStudio rebounded with a commitment from MacKiev and the return of the original founder Roger Wagner.

There is probably a message or two here. Textbooks are too slow for the pace of change in some areas – use the web (we try). Never assume too much from a service you did not purchase. Backup often.

Loading